Liar Liar Pants on Fire

April 27th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

As Allahpundit puts it, the stupid flag pin issue turns stupider yet again. You see, a while back Barack Obama said that wearing a flag pin had become a substitute for true patriotism. He defined true patriotism as: “speaking out on issues that are of importance to our national security.”

Bloggers then reported about it, some blasting him for insulting those who wear flag pins. Now, personally I don’t think that he tried to insult those who do choose to wear a flag pin, but he did express himself a bit unlucky there, to say the least. You could most certainly make the case that what he said was insulting to those who wear flag pins (to show their love for their country).

Anyway, but those bloggers simply reported what he said. Now, Obama calls them liars. He now says: “And somebody said ‘Why don’t you wear a flag pin?’ I said, well, sometimes I do, sometimes I don’t. I said, although I will say that sometimes I notice that they’re people who wear flag pins but they don’t always act patriotic. And I was specifically referring to politicians, not individuals who wear flag pins, but politicians who you see wearing flag pins and then vote against funding for veterans, saying we can’t afford it.”

Charles Johnson explains:

 Obama’s two radically different versions of his reasons for not wearing the pin are there for you to read. Here’s our post about it at the time. You decide who’s telling the truth.

The fact of the matter is that Obama tries to spin his words, whereas bloggers who oppose him interpret his words in the most negative way possible. Negative interpretation, yes. Lying? No. In fact, Obama’s changing his reason so much, that the “liar” charge should be turned against him.

What’s even more stupid is that he’s keeping this issue alive. It’s a non-issue.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Claudia
    April 27th, 2008 at 14:34
    Reply | Quote | #1

    You could most certainly make the case that what he said was insulting to those who wear flag pins (to show their love for their country).

    Only if you were pre-offended by Obama and simply looking for a rationalization. It’s as if I heard someone saying "I’m a Christian because I love Jesus and his message of love" and concluded that the person was implying that anyone who wasn’t Christian believes in a message of hate.

    I find it surprising and amusing that people who oppose Obama feel that they have to go after issues this embarrassingly stupid, instead of actually trying to confront Obama on policy positions. Personally, I find it insulting that that’s the opinion those strategists have of my intelligence, but I find it more worrisome that that kind of idiotic pablum works on a lot of people.

  2. C Stanley
    April 27th, 2008 at 14:55
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Claudia, I don’t want to make too much over the flag pin issue itself, but your analogy to atheists taking offense at Christian attitudes actually proves the opposite point than the one you are making IMO. Point of fact, a lot of atheists/agnostics DO interpret Christian beliefs that way (I think I’ve even seen some comments like that from you.) And they have some reason to feel that way, because some Christians do express their opinions of atheists being immoral.

    So any Christian who wanted to avoid being divisive like that would make a point of explaining that he/she didn’t think that nonbelievers were bad people. That’s where Obama erred in his initial explanation of why he wasn’t wearing a flag pin; he expressed a view that was in solidarity with those who scorn pin wearers, instead of just acting as though it was no big deal. He could have chosen his words much differently to say that he knew that a lot of people wore pins to express true patriotism, but that he didn’t think the symbol itself proved anything one way or another. Instead he said that he had deliberately chosen to take it off, as though not wearing the pin was a conscious choice of a different kind of symbolism that was quite important to him.

    In your analogy, this would be like an atheist stating that he couldn’t possibly agree with Christians because they are all deluded and practice a false morality- and then turning around later and acting like he/she couldn’t understand why any Christians took offense at that.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500