Britons Kidnapped in Iraq, Held by Iran

April 27th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Two separate sources in the Middle East and London told The Times, the five Britons who were kidnapped in Iraq last year, are held by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard… in Iran. ‘The hostages were handed over to the Revolutionary Guards by their Iraqi kidnappers last November, the sources believe. One of the sources said they were being held in the western Iranian city of Hamadan.’

If confirmed, the involvement of Revolutionary Guards would be seen as evidence that senior figures in the Iranian government had backed the decision to hold them in the country.

However, British officials said that while there had been rumours that the five were in Iran, they had seen no evidence to support the idea.

The hostages are said to be in good physical shape but spending much of their time in solitary confinement.

According to one of the sources, they are under the control of Mohammad Safaei, 41, a senior Revolutionary Guard colonel who was previously in charge of special operations in the southern Iraqi city of Basra.

The hostages were kidnapped in Baghdad last May in an attempt to force the Americans to release Qais al-Khazaali, an Iraqi militia leader said to be close to the Revolutionary Guards.

Khazaali was apparently being groomed by Iran to take control of a breakaway faction of the Mahdi Army, a Shi’ite militia, that would be compliant with Tehran. A former chief spokesman for the Mahdi Army, Khazaali was arrested by US troops after masterminding a raid inside a base in which five US soldiers were killed. The Americans have refused to release al-Khazaali in exchange for the British hostages.

One of the sources, who has close links to the Revolutionary Guard, said the captors were looking for a face-saving way of freeing them. They have suggested the hostages write to church leaders in the UK asking for assistance in gaining their release, the source said.

Obviously, one needs more information, especially the countries involved have to find out where the five truly are, but if they’re being held by Iran - and I think it’s pretty safe to assume they probably are - this constitutes yet another act of war by the Mullahs against a Western country. It’s utterly amazing that we let the Mullahs get away with this crap. NATO could destroy the country within the blink of an eye. Yet, we all choose to let the Iranians do whatever it is they want to do to us.

Where’s the (real) Iron Lady when you need her? You think she would have accepted this BS from the Mullahs? Me thinks not.

The only reason, by the way, that the Iranians are doing is, is that they know that they can get away with it. After all, if Britain didn’t fight back when its sailors were kidnapped by the Revolutionary Guard, the Monarchy will never fight.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Cernig
    April 27th, 2008 at 18:39
    Reply | Quote | #1

    LOL!

    The author of that Times report is Uzi Mahnaimi, author of more crappy anti-Iran stories than even Amir Taheri, as PJM’s Yourish has noted often enough. He’s also author of the North Korean "Thunderbirds" airbase story in the same paper today.

    Oh, and the UK government has admitted the Brit seamen were in disputed waters that the US and UK say were outside Iranian territory but had neglected to inform the Iranians of the borderline they were applying. That’s not kidnapping. When Iran invades the Falkland Islands, then we Brits will need someone to do an Iron Lady.

    Regards, C

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500