PoliGazette » ElectionSnark (25 April)

ElectionSnark (25 April)

Filed under: 2008 elections, Barack Obama, Democrats, Feature, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Republicans — Jason, Managing Editor on April 26, 2008 @ 4:36 am CEST

PBS airs an interview featuring a long-time anti-American with a long record of spewing bile towards anyone he disagrees with about anything. Infamous Rev. Jeremiah Wright was also there.

Keith Olbermann proves to be a complete ass. Yet. Again. Disgusting, but not sexism. Oh. But it’s ok. He apologized. Think he will ever apologize for his insanely long history of outrageously over-the-top BDS? Nah. Way too much to hope for. Why Olbermann went from being a second-rate sportscaster to a third-rate political commentator, we’ll never know.

The height of Democrat political humor has been acheived: “old guy” jokes.

Clinton campaign loses key fund-raiser at a crucial time. Booking limits on the Lincoln Bedroom may be to blame.

The pattern of demanding candidates apologize for what other people say seems to never die. It’s going to become impossible to ever elect anyone to anything if the standard is that they cannot have ever associated with a moron.

Fred Thompson says he would reject VP nomination. No sign that anyone was going to offer it to him.

And, of course, the empty “yay for us” story of the day.

All links via Memeorandum.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.