Closure Case Erdogan’s Fault

April 24th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

European Parliament: Erdogan only has himself to blame for the closure case against his party, the AKP. The reason, according to the enlightened members of this fake Parliament? “The government put on the brakes on reforms. Article 301 [of the penal code, which criminalizes insulting Turkishness] still stands and no step has been taken in terms of freedom of speech. Now the AKP suffers the consequences of its own mistakes.”

Partially true, of course, but there’s more to it than that, as anyone who knows a little bit about Turkey knows. Namely, it’s also Erdogan’s fault in the sense that he has pushed through Islamic reforms, even though he knew that the country’s Kemalists opposed those reforms, and that they were willing to go to war for the Kemalist principles. They told him, he knew it, yet he was arrogant enough to say ‘well, we were the winners during the last elections, so the Kemalists will simply give in to our mandate. They have to.’

No they don’t.

Stupidity and arrogance are more to blame than ’stalling reforms proposed by the European Parliament.’

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. JudasPriest
    April 24th, 2008 at 19:34
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Right on. We are seeing ineptitude and bad policy making at the executive and representative wings of the Turkish democracy. The crux of this problem, i.e., why Turkey cant seem to recruit its elected officials among educated, able, open-minded people is the fact that the parties are run by self-interest seekers who base their selection processes on feudal-like principles. Sadly and equally contradictory, the only party who demonstrated some diversion from this old oligarchic administration style is AKP.  There is undeniable attraction from among a layer of the society who are educated, full of passion, and slanted to overlook the erosion of secular foundation in return of personal gain towards politics since they are given a chance to be in the process by AKP.  If CHP or a new formation, could revitalize themselves by bringing the quality human potential of Turkey in their ranks  towards the good of the country by keeping loyal to the secular foundation, the democratic reforms, most important of all, free speech, free media, no judicial immunity for apolitical reasons, would all be put in effect in no time. But then EU would not have had any excuse to stall its negotiations with Turkey. Though, I have no doubt that they’ll find something else.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500