Bush Sets a Record

Filed under: Feature, United States — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on April 22, 2008 @ 6:05 pm CEST

He’s the most unpopular president in over 70 years. At this moment, only 28% of the American people approve of the job he is doing, against 69% who disapprove. That’s the highest negative rating in the 70-year history of the Gallup Poll.

For those who are wondering, that means that he’s less popular than LBJ and Harry Truman during the Korean War.

Ironically enough, Bush also holds the record for the highest approval rating of all time: shortly after 9/11, 90% of the American people approved of the job he was doing.

The good news for Bush? He can’t run for reelection.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

4 Comments »

  1. 1 Chris

    April 22, 2008 @ 9:58 pm CEST

    So is it fair to say (setting aside the Roosevelt exception) that wars and popularity don’t go together?

  2. 2 Jason

    April 22, 2008 @ 10:09 pm CEST

    The evidence from history is pretty good that (in democracies) wars increase popularity of leaders in the short term and decrease it in the long term.

  3. 3 Interested

    April 22, 2008 @ 11:52 pm CEST

    Congress would love to have Bush’s ratings

  4. 4 Jay_C

    April 23, 2008 @ 4:05 pm CEST

    Not to be nit-picky, but you probably meant to say …..less popular than LBJ during Vietnam and Harry Truman during the Korean War…

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • wilky: It is what it is Michael. Its been this way since I started reading the papers way back in 1967. The...
  • Michael Merritt: The best way to make families a non-issue is probably to ignore those who are making them an...
  • PhilosopherP: IF it is true, and that seems to be far from certain, they need to watch the old movie "But...
  • Michael Merritt: You know I’m a critic of the media, and have even defended Palin against some of the grossly...
  • moorpipe: 11th August 2008 - Luggage Handlers Strike at Brussels Airport Baggage handlers employed by Aviapartner and...

Partners