Obama Gives Clinton the Finger?

Filed under: 2008 elections — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on April 18, 2008 @ 11:32 am CEST

If you watch the video carefully, you’ll see that he suddenly scratches his cheek with his middle finger, right after he mentions Senator Hillary Clinton.

On purpose? Not on purpose? Judge for yourself. I do know this:

1. It’s the oldest trick in the book to give people the finger (while being able to deny it nonetheless). I’ve used it many times and still use it sometimes (what can I say, I’m in my early 20s).

2.  The crowd interpreted it as him giving Clinton the finger.

3. Obama will obviously deny it and say that those who say they are sure that he gave Hillary the finger are paranoid. And many of his supporters will agree. And perhaps they are right.

Many people believe that it was on purpose:

The Democratic Daily (also go here to see a photo short from the other side; it’s perfectly clear that Obama did not scratch with two fingers):

 It’s appears that way to me. The timing, the gesture, the sheer passive-aggressiveness of the act, which would fit Obama’s passive-aggressive campaign, couldn’t be simply a habitual gesture.

The Swamp:

  And that’s the part of the videotape, courtesy of Fox News, where viewers need to pay some attention to the hand that Obama raised to his face, and the finger with which he scratched it.

LA Times:

 This is one of those political moments that really needs few words.

We’ll no doubt hear much more about this incident in coming days. […]

The presidential candidate raises his right hand to seemingly scratch his cheek.

He doesn’t use his whole hand though. Just one finger. Briefly. A couple of strokes.

Democratic presidential candidate and Illinois Senator Barack Obama touches his cheek with one finger while criticizing his opponent New York Senator Hillary Clinton April 17, 2008 during remarks in Raleigh, NC

He pauses. He smiles slyly as the crowd begins to mumble and then he tries, somewhat distracted, to continue his remarks, smiling as the buzz spreads through the crowd.

He’ll no doubt deny it later, but that mischievous smile seems to confirm plenty. And the crowd sure sees something.

 Red State:

 After losing the debate tonight, Obama gave Hillary the finger today. I don’t know if he intended to do that hand gesture in his pause while talking about Hillary, but it is obvious the crowd thought it was an intentional raising of the middle finger.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

11 Comments »

  1. 1 Interested

    April 18, 2008 @ 12:28 pm CEST

    It’s perfect

    It’ll let HRC play the victim - the role she knows so well.  Gives Obama exposure since hey - we have all done it.

    Next time does not need to be so coy, come out and do it.

  2. 2 C Stanley

    April 18, 2008 @ 4:14 pm CEST

    Perfect for McCain too, since the one way that his age disadvantage could turn around into an advantage is for his opponents to continue acting like children.

  3. 3 Lydia

    April 19, 2008 @ 12:24 am CEST

    Shortly before that he had used his baby finger to touch his face, lips, etc.

  4. 4 Condor

    April 19, 2008 @ 12:44 am CEST

    Wonderful contribution to our political dialogue PoliGazette. You should be very proud.

  5. 5 BJ

    April 19, 2008 @ 5:41 am CEST

    Listen to the Obamanuts; stop drinking the kool aid you poor pathetic creatures. Political Dialogue? Are you kidding? His hands did all the talking I need to hear from him. He is childish, immature, and much too full of himself  for his own good to say nothing of ours. He is not fit to be Potus, and I don’t want that finger close to any nuclear buttons. Here’s hoping he loses PA and Indiana.

  6. 6 Haydn

    April 19, 2008 @ 4:18 pm CEST

    You’ve got to see the whole video to really see his intentions. He’s not ever recieving my vote after that incident. I will not follow a leader that can show such disrespect. Maybe he should run for president somewhere like Venezuela. They like his type.

  7. 7 goldenstate

    April 19, 2008 @ 8:41 pm CEST

    After seeing Obama give Hillary "the finger", I won’t vote for him if he is the nominee. He has no class.

  8. 8 I SPEAK

    April 20, 2008 @ 1:53 am CEST

    Obama gives Hillary the middle finger and brushes his shoulders off like Big Pimpin’ Jay-Z after acting like a comedian with his Annie Oakley BS. He is not presidential. At all. He does not take this seriously. I DO!! IT’S MY (OUR) COUNTRY.

  9. 9 Interested

    April 20, 2008 @ 4:35 am CEST

    looks like the paul-bots are supporting HRC now.

  10. 10 Rei

    April 20, 2008 @ 8:47 am CEST

    Um. Hello, there are videos of this “flip-off” shot from the side. And from the side, it’s blatantly obvious that he was scratching with both his middle *and* ring fingers. He scratched his cheek with two fingers. Not too long after he scratched the same spot with his pinky finger. Whoop-de-doo — it’s apparently now time to analyze which fingers (or sets of fingers) Obama scratches itches with. And since when to politicians write-in televised flip-offs into pre-planned speeches anyways?

    This whole “controversy” is idiotic from all angles.

  11. 11 Hassan

    April 22, 2008 @ 2:36 pm CEST

    yo I dont read the long  conversations you guys write

    Obama 2008!!!!!!!!!

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • WHYNOT: Palin has the nerve to talk about Obama - when she infact is one step away from being a felon. Troopergate,...
  • MichaelS: Absolutely not. Liberals have been out of power for 8 years. They would have taken Hillary in a heartbeat....
  • plunge protection team joke: Remember, you MUST take one of the candidates who forced you to pay for the Wall Street...
  • Den Gran: McCain deserves to lose, but for his policies and dirty political tactics, not because he’s not being...
  • John Maszka: This bailout is just one more example of the indivisible handjob stroking irresponsible CEOs and CFOs...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here