Sometimes I have a tendency to treat liberal as if it is a dirty word. And sometimes I skip the part about explaining why that is, yet again, because that dirtiness is so obvious. Since an apology is required for every misdeed in this day and age, well, I’m sorry for not spelling it out. 
Happily, Rachel Lucas is, using her own kind of straight talk, more than willing to take up my slack. Enjoy!
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
lmao she shouldn’t hold back - really.
And given the amount she is sending in - the lib’s think she just does not pay enough.
Ahh, I love the smell of bigotry in the morning.
sometimes I respond to ignorant clown’s posts sometimes I do not.
Is it just me or does it seems that the blogosphere has brought out a side to women that we’ve not traditionally seen? (Everyone expects men to periodically be loud and obnoxious.)
Maybe Rachel should include corporations in her rant? After all they get some hefty bailouts and tax breaks along with the folks she is railing against. For every complaint against liberalism there are just as many against corporatism, which industry lobbyists have ensured will be flourishing for quite some time.