Angela Merkel Gives Certain Finger to China

April 13th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

This is why I believe that conservative women are often great national leaders. There is, of course, M. Thatcher, and now we have, in Europe, Angela Merkel. She is Germany’s Chancellor and not quite willing to give in to pressure from China: shortly after China tried to convince her not to meet with the Dalai Lama for the foreseeable future, she has said that she will most certainly meet with the Tibetan leader again.

And she’s not the only German politician who’s giving China the middle finger:

 Angela Merkel has sent out a signal in the midst of the controversy over the crackdown in Tibet and the appropriate way to deal with the communist regime in Beijing: The German chancellor has announced a future meeting with the Dalai Lama. Merkel will be in Latin America during the time of the Dalai Lama’s next visit to Germany, “but I will certainly meet again with the Dalai Lama at a later point in the future,” she told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung newspaper.

Merkel also defended her decision to hold a reception for the Nobel peace prize recipient in the Chancellery last September — an event that sparked a serious diplomatic row (more…) between Berlin and Beijing. “First of all, my reception of the Dalai Lama and my dealings with China are two different things,” she said. “But both are related to how we deal with whether or not human rights are being observed or disregarded, and Germany’s position here is clear, and receiving the Dalai Lama also belongs to that.”

According to information obtained by SPIEGEL, German Bundestag President Norbert Lammert of Merkel’s conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) is resisting pressure from the Chinese government to cancel his planned meeting with the Dalai Lama. The chairman of the German parliament’s foreign affairs committee, Ruprecht Polenz of the CDU, also wrote to the Dalai Lama requesting a meeting.

Polenz is still waiting for a reply from the Tibetan spiritual leader. For his part, though, Lammert has been subjected to considerable pressure over his plan to meet with the Tibetan spiritual leader. Employees at the Chinese Embassy in Berlin intervened and China’s ambassador to Germany carried out a one-hour telephone call with Lammert. Last week, however, Lammert is said to have sent a critical letter in which he resisted embassy pressure and clearly expressed his concern about the “current situation — not only in Tibet, but also in other parts of China.”…

The meeting between the president of parliament and the Dalai Lama is scheduled to take place in the western German city of Bochum and in an unofficial capacity. Nevertheless, the Chinese fear that a meeting between the man who is formally one of the country’s most important political representatives will be taken seriously internationally.

This is precisely how the West should deal with China. China is stubborn, we should be the same. There are certain things that are non-negotiable, get used to it.

That should be our attitude, and the more we put this uncompromising attitude into practice, the more China will respect us and take our principles into consideration.

With China it has always been a one way street. That has got to end. We’re not any more dependent on China than China is on us. There’s no need for us to surrender at every opportunity.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500