Clinton Lead in Pennsylvania Decreases

Filed under: 2008 elections — Michael van der Galien on April 10, 2008 @ 9:56 pm CEST

Well, now that a serious poll is out saying that Barack Obama is closing the gap in Pennsylvania, it’s time for me to spend some attention to the recent developments. He has closed the gap, according to this poll, to 6%. This while Clinton was leading by 14% or so only a couple of weeks ago.

Clinton has to win big in Pennsylvania. If Obama comes close, she’ll probably drop out shortly after the results are announced. And rightfully so. If she wants to continue her candidacy, she’s got to beat Obama by a wide margin.

I’m getting the impression that Democrats are - slowly but surely - rallying around one person. And that person isn’t Clinton, it’s Obama.

This thing will probably be decided within a matter of weeks. And Obama will win it.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

6 Comments »

  1. 1 Claudia

    April 10, 2008 @ 10:20 pm CEST

    Clinton has to win big in Pennsylvania. If Obama comes close, she’ll probably drop out shortly after the results are announced. And rightfully so. If she wants to continue her candidacy, she’s got to beat Obama by a wide margin.

    I doubt it. She’ll just move the goalposts again, to Indiana probably. Mind you, though the polls are at 6%, I think she’ll win PA by a wider margin than that. It won’t be a blowout to be sure, but it will be a clear lead. Anywhere between 10-15% though 15 is probably too much. Not enough to make huge inroads into his popular vote lead, and virtually worthless against his delegate lead.

  2. 2 Adi

    April 10, 2008 @ 10:27 pm CEST

    She won’t drop out. The last thing coming from her campaign is that Obama has to win in PA and win big to gain the benefit of doubt that he could win the nomination. Leave it to the Clintons…

  3. 3 Dusty

    April 10, 2008 @ 10:50 pm CEST

    You’d have to drag Hillary kicking and screaming out of the convention.  That womans has major issues!

  4. 4 Interested

    April 10, 2008 @ 11:41 pm CEST

    I have to agree with Claudia, lets not delude ourselves into thinking Clinton is capable of having anyone’s interests at mind than her own.

  5. 5 andrew of california

    April 11, 2008 @ 6:47 pm CEST

    Leadership and taxes

    “It’s important to have core principles and values, but if you’re going to be active in policy and politics, you have to be a realist.” —Hillary Clinton
    “We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re going to cut short and not give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” —Hillary Clinton, in a 2004 fundraising speech to wealthy liberals in San Francisco

    Bipartisanship and reaching across the isle

    “I believe in evil, and I think that there are evil people in the world.” —Hillary Clinton, in 1993, stating her opinion not of the terrorists who had just bombed the World Trade Center for the first time in 1993, but of those who opposed her health care reform plan  “You have got to hand it to them, these people are ruthless and they are relentless.” —Sen. Hillary Clinton, just a few months after 9/11, giving her opinion of Republicans Health care  “We just can’t trust the American people to make these types of decisions. …Government has to make these choices for people.” —Hillary Clinton circa 1993, speaking to Rep. Dennis Hastert on the issue of who should control the allocation of money in her health care reform plan
    “We can’t afford to have that money go to the private sector. The money has to go to the federal government because the federal government will spend that money better than the private sector will spend it.” —First Lady Hillary Clinton, in 1993, regarding health care reform
    Free speech

    “We’re all going to have to rethink how we deal with the Internet. As exciting as these new developments are, there are a number of serious issues without any kind of editing function or gate-keeping function.” —First Lady Hillary Clinton, in 1998, days after the Monica Lewinsky story was reported
    Blaming America

    “I pledge allegiance to the America that can be.” —Hillary Clinton, reluctant to say the Pledge of Allegiance, according to Chris Matthews
    “The unfettered free market has been the most radically disruptive force in American life in the last generation.” —Hillary Clinton
    Imagination

    “The fact of the matter is, I’ve always been a Yankees fan.” —Senate candidate Hillary Clinton, soon after launching her campaign in 1999, and ignoring prior public statements about growing up as a Cubs fan in Chicago  

  6. 6 Ken

    April 11, 2008 @ 9:13 pm CEST

    Very interesting article. In fact, it’s going to be better if the Democrats resolve this issue now because I see so many people getting bored with the whole thing. The question now is, who will be the final candidate that will represent the party? Read Breaking News, Politics and Election. Join the conversation http://empowertube.blogspot.com

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Kaspar: I think they only stopped booing because her daughter showed up, which is pretty basic decency. But they...
  • Thorsten Veblen: You say, quote, "Turkish police arrested a Kurdish woman", however nowhere in the link...
  • Polimom: Kaspar rather colorfully makes the correct point, Michael.   As far as I can tell, "Boos"...
  • Kaspar: "When Republicans boo at the very mention of Barack Obama, the mainstream media, and especially the New...
  • lgc65: as someone who has listened to min. farrakhan’s address 2-3 times, i can assure you that he did not call...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here