Eye Mask for Men

April 6th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Via The Instanbulian comes a great alternative to the headscarf or türban or, even worse, burka for women: an eye mask for men who aren’t able to control themselves if they see a woman who doesn’t cover her hair (and neck). As most will know, some fundamentalist Muslim men want their women to cover up - and other women as well for that matter - so they (men) won’t be tempted to commit a sin or even to think about sinning.

But if that’s the problem, wouldn’t it be easier and more logical for those men to do something, and not for women?

The text reads: “Hey Men; Your Decency Is Up To You (Not To Women). Wear An Eye Mask. Protect Yourself.”

Good stuff.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. JudasPriest
    April 6th, 2008 at 16:35
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Not enough Michael, they need to have their brain transferred from a monkey so that they’d be more rational when it comes to how the other gender should dress so that they’d not be aroused. Personally, to their dissatisfaction, I feel tingling under my waist when I see a woman with turban than one with a short-skirt.

  2. C Stanley
    April 6th, 2008 at 18:43
    Reply | Quote | #2

    LOL, that is funny. Of course, there are other approaches that could be advocated as well- you know, like the OT sentiment of cutting off your hand or gouging out your eye if it causes you to sin. The eye here might be one organ that men may need to cut out, or perhaps another organ…

    Kidding, of course. But I do think the point behind this is valid- modesty is an appropriate virtue for women, but it takes two, and men have to live up to their responsibilities as well.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500