Chinese Kill Eight Tibetans

Filed under: Asia, Bejing 08, China, Olympic Games, Sports, Tibet — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on April 5, 2008 @ 4:00 pm CEST

The Times (of London) has an exclusive report up: ” Chinese paramilitary police killed eight people and wounded dozens more when they fired on a protest by several hundred Tibetan monks and villagers, The Times has been told.”

The protesters were enraged by a government inspection team trying to confiscate pictures of the Dalai Lama.

The clash, one of the bloodiest since Tibetan protests against China erupted last month, occurred in the village of Donggu, high in the mountains of Sichuan province near the border with Tibet, after government officials entered the sprawling ancient hillside monastery of Tongkor.

They searched the room of every monk, confiscating all mobile phones as well as the pictures. The monastery’s website (www.donggusi.com) says that it is home to 350 monks. A contact telephone for the monastery was not operational yesterday.

When the officials had removed the photographs, a 74-year-old monk, identified as Cicheng Danzeng, tried to stop police from throwing the images on the ground — an act seen as a desecration by Tibetans, who revere the Dalai Lama as their god king. A young man working in the monastery, Cicheng Pingcuo, 25, also made a stand and both were arrested.

The team of officials then demanded that all the monks denounce the Dalai Lama, who fled China after a failed uprising in 1959. One monk, Yixi Lima, stood up and voiced his opposition, prompting the other monks to add their voices.

About 6.30pm, the entire monastic body marched down to a nearby river, where paramilitary police were encamped and demanded the release of the two men. They were joined by several hundred local villagers, many of them enraged at the detention of the elderly monk, who locals say is well respected in the area for his learning and piety.

Shouting “Long Live the Dalai Lama”, “Let the Dalai Lama come back” and “We want freedom”, the crowd demonstrated until about 9pm.

Witnesses said that up to 1,000 paramilitary police used force to try to end the protest and opened fire on the crowd. In the gunfire, eight people died, according to a local resident in direct contact with the monastery. These included a 27-year-old monk identified as Cangdan and two women named as Zhulongcuo and Danluo.

Such a wonderful country to host the Olympic Games this year, China. Isn’t it? They’re staying true to the spirit of the Games. Harmony. Peace. Equality. Celebrating life.

And how does the International Olympic Committee deal with it? Simple, they have written guidelines for the media (Michelle Malkin):

So it is with a certain grim satisfaction that I pass along the secret International Olympic Committee’s media guidelines, dug up by the Wall Street Journal. Basically, they want to make sure you know that these notions you have about “freedom of the press” and “freedom of expression” need to be bottled up, because Beijing wants everything to run smoothly:

Addressing its world-wide members in an internal memo, viewed by The Wall Street Journal, the IOC reiterates its opposition to taking any public stance on controversial Chinese policies, describing them as “sovereign matters outside of our mandate.”

Sure, I can understand the IOC wanting to keep the muzzle on its own members. But how about this part?

The eight-page “briefing kit,” whose existence was made public by the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders, also calls on national Olympic committees to send athletes who are “in compliance with the Olympic Charter” to the Games.

“Athletes will have total freedom of expression” to answer questions from the media, the memo states.

“However, rules for athletes clearly state that the venues of the Games are not a place for proactive political or religious expression,” the memo says, adding: “In Beijing, sanctions and penalties will be applied in any cases considered to be a breach of IOC policy.”

Did I read that right? Governments are being pressured to pick politically acceptable athletes? And what do they mean by “sanctions and penalties?”

What countries need to do is to send the best athletes and hope that they’re politically active. My respect for athletes will increase tremendously if they use the Games to point out that China’s government is barbaric.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

2 Comments »

  1. 1 Muyu Guo

    April 5, 2008 @ 8:18 pm CEST

    "8 people died … in the gunfile". This is very serious statement and cannot be lightly commented (sarcasm or not). Although difficult to verify, the fact must be independently checked and if true, be vigrously prosecuted by the world. It surely feels superior and reassuring to band other party as "barbaric", however this feeling must be based on absolute clear, unequivocal facts.  News can be untrue because of many reasons,  it may conveniently fits some people’s agenda.  Think this way, if the news is proven untrue, are you going to have the same comments towards the whole event, and are you prepared to withdraw any of your words?

  2. 2 MianQin

    April 6, 2008 @ 9:02 am CEST

    I was a Chinese journalist. I was an organizer of the Chinese students in the US in support of the movement in the Tiananmen Square in 1989. Since then I have been studying and living in the US for past 20 years. In that time span, one thing I noticed is that among many anti-Chinese and blatant China-bashing authors are American Jews. They do not genuinely have a legitimate issue with China other than the anger at China’s Middle East policy, which often voted for the Palestine People at the UN forum. You and your adapted story: “Chinese Kill Eight Tibetans”  is one more unmistakable proof. The original story “Chinese police kill eight after opening fire on monks and Tibet” has been perverted  to “ Chinese Kill Eight Tibetans”, an inflammatorily sensational headline, which deliberately imparts hatred flames between the Han Chinese and the Tibetan Chinese. You may have an  intention to rouse hatred against the Chinese people among the US readers as well. You are,  Sir, no better than those of the European racists who once had done the genocide on European Jews. Your story and you shall be my story to inform the vast number of the young Chinese of the true picture of America.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Eric Dondero: If you vote for Sarah Palin YOU ARE VOTING 3RD PARTY.  She’s a libertarian Republican. ...
  • AlexP1: …So, 40 year old history is now news….The Vietnam War as a travesty in this nation back then, so...
  • David: Thanks Michael.  I read your site nearly every day, but I don’t always have time to comment.
  • Jay_C: I’m still holding on to hope, but I’d like to see things getting better, not worse.
  • Michael: Wow… the bailout worked as expected… Like pouring gasoline on a fire… Let me guess…...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here