http://poligazette.com/2008/04/05/chinese-kill-eight-tibetans/ Politics and world events from a moderately liberal and conservative perspective Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:38:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 http://poligazette.com/2008/04/05/chinese-kill-eight-tibetans/#comment-39183 MianQin Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:02:36 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/04/05/chinese-kill-eight-tibetans/#comment-39183 I was a Chinese journalist. I was an organizer of the Chinese students in the US in support of the movement in the Tiananmen Square in 1989. Since then I have been studying and living in the US for past 20 years. In that time span, one thing I noticed is that among many anti-Chinese and blatant China-bashing authors are American Jews. They do not genuinely have a legitimate issue with China other than the anger at China’s Middle East policy, which often voted for the Palestine People at the UN forum. You and your adapted story: “Chinese Kill Eight Tibetans”  is one more unmistakable proof. The original story “Chinese police kill eight after opening fire on monks and Tibet” has been perverted  to “ <a href="/" rel="nofollow">Chinese Kill Eight Tibetans</a>”, an inflammatorily sensational headline, which deliberately imparts hatred flames between the Han Chinese and the Tibetan Chinese. You may have an  intention to rouse hatred against the Chinese people among the US readers as well. You are,  Sir, no better than those of the European racists who once had done the genocide on European Jews. Your story and you shall be my story to inform the vast number of the young Chinese of the true picture of America. I was a Chinese journalist. I was an organizer of the Chinese students in the US in support of the movement in the Tiananmen Square in 1989. Since then I have been studying and living in the US for past 20 years. In that time span, one thing I noticed is that among many anti-Chinese and blatant China-bashing authors are American Jews. They do not genuinely have a legitimate issue with China other than the anger at China’s Middle East policy, which often voted for the Palestine People at the UN forum. You and your adapted story: “Chinese Kill Eight Tibetans”  is one more unmistakable proof. The original story “Chinese police kill eight after opening fire on monks and Tibet” has been perverted  to “ Chinese Kill Eight Tibetans”, an inflammatorily sensational headline, which deliberately imparts hatred flames between the Han Chinese and the Tibetan Chinese. You may have an  intention to rouse hatred against the Chinese people among the US readers as well. You are,  Sir, no better than those of the European racists who once had done the genocide on European Jews. Your story and you shall be my story to inform the vast number of the young Chinese of the true picture of America.

]]> http://poligazette.com/2008/04/05/chinese-kill-eight-tibetans/#comment-39029 Muyu Guo Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:18:55 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/04/05/chinese-kill-eight-tibetans/#comment-39029 "8 people died ... in the gunfile". This is very serious statement and cannot be lightly commented (sarcasm or not). Although difficult to verify, the fact must be independently checked and if true, be vigrously prosecuted by the world. It surely feels superior and reassuring to band other party as "barbaric", however this feeling must be based on absolute clear, unequivocal facts.  News can be untrue because of many reasons,  it may conveniently fits some people's agenda.  Think this way, if the news is proven untrue, are you going to have the same comments towards the whole event, and are you prepared to withdraw any of your words? "8 people died … in the gunfile". This is very serious statement and cannot be lightly commented (sarcasm or not). Although difficult to verify, the fact must be independently checked and if true, be vigrously prosecuted by the world. It surely feels superior and reassuring to band other party as "barbaric", however this feeling must be based on absolute clear, unequivocal facts.  News can be untrue because of many reasons,  it may conveniently fits some people’s agenda.  Think this way, if the news is proven untrue, are you going to have the same comments towards the whole event, and are you prepared to withdraw any of your words?

]]>