Helping The Rich

Filed under: Health Care, United States — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on April 2, 2008 @ 3:00 pm CEST

Michelle Malkin notes that rich families are delighted with New Jersey’s S-CHIP program: “People earning as much as $295,000 are enrolled in a state health care program designed for New Jersey’s poor, according to a new audit that found the state failing to check eligibility for all program enrollees.”

NJ FamilyCare is meant to help working poor parents and children.

But the state auditor found vendors aren’t performing eligibility checks and the state isn’t checking applications for unreported income.

The state also failed to try to collect $4.6 million owed to the program by 16,300 people who were disenrolled, the audit found.

“Working poor,” “working rich,” I mean; it’s all relative, right?

And there’s more, so head on over to Michelle’s place. Ed Morrissey also has more at Hot Air.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

1 Comment »

  1. 1 PatHMV

    April 2, 2008 @ 4:04 pm CEST

    Looks like President Bush was right, as I noted <a href="http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/schip-bush-and-the-democrats/">here</a> and <a href="http://stubbornfacts.us/domestic_policy/health_care/the_truth_about_schip_expansion">here</a>.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • David: Would somebody please delete the double post?
  • David: I think that her biggest plus is the fact that her Alaska administration has a reputation for successful...
  • David: I think that her biggest plus is the fact that her Alaska administration has a reputation for successful...
  • Kevin H: I’m comming in to this late. But I’ll start off with inexperience. I think that your right...
  • Mikeh: "To me the idea that someone could have their finger on the button that would give credence to the most...

Partners