Clinton Backer: Obama Will Probably Win

April 2nd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Well, this is quite blunt: ‘”If I had to make a prediction right now, I’d say Barack Obama is going to be the next president,” Missouri Rep. Emanuel Cleaver said in a Canadian public radio interview this weekend.’

Perhaps someone should have informed him that this isn’t exactly what Hillary Clinton needs right now.

He made matters even worse by adding: “I will be stunned if he’s not the next president of the United States.”

You’re not helllping.

And about a possible fight at the Democratic convention Cleaver had the following to say: “If I do the party line, I’m supposed to say — and maybe I’ll say, just so if anybody hears it they can say well, ‘Cleaver did the party line before he told the truth’ — we believe that a contest going all the way to the convention is good for America.”

Adding that ‘an actual convention fight would be a “tragedy of tragedies.”’

But he’s honest, and that’s refreshing. It’s clear that Obama is the favorite; basically the only way for Clinton to win is to continue to win the big states and to damage Obama so much that the Democratic Party’s superdelegates think that he won’t be able to beat John McCain in November.

Clinton still has a chance, but Cleaver is right when he points out that it’s basically in Obama’s hands now. He’s now a household name, he’s leading delegate-wise… he’s leading in the polls.

He should be able to close this deal.

But: Clinton is right to hang in there. It’s so close that a mistake by Obama could cost him the nomination.

As an aside, I think that Cleaver is right about Obama vs. Clinton, but he may be wrong about Obama vs. McCain. All polls have McCain leading Obama these days. It won’t be a walkover for the latter.

Where we all ‘knew’ a year ago that a Democrat would become America’s next president, we all now realize that a Republican could very well win it; especially if national security is made an issue again.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. realcampaign
    April 2nd, 2008 at 19:18
    Reply | Quote | #1

    While his honesty may be refreshing, as you say, I think there has to be motive behind it. I find it hard to believe he just blew it and spoke his mind without realizing that an interview for a national Canadian radio broadcast wouldn’t get back to the campaign. And he’s speaking as a Clinton campaign Missouri co-chair and Clinton pledged super-delegate.So I think his reasoning could likely be that he is seeking to help put an end to the Clinton campaign, and also to attempt to explain his continued support for Clinton even though she is losing.

  2. Hillary For Prez
    April 2nd, 2008 at 22:44
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I agree with realcampaign, there is a motive behind his words.  I think he is an ass who plays both sides of the fence.  If I were Hillary, I wouldn’t want him.  I’d tell him to go to Obama and publically state so.  Cleaver is a joke.  He wants to be with Obama because he is Black.  He didn’t know a Black man would be running one day.  But go Cleaver, cling to your brother and leave us true Clintonians alone, jeeez!!  Enough already!

  3. Interested
    April 2nd, 2008 at 23:09
    Reply | Quote | #3

    He didn’t know a Black man would be running one day. But go Cleaver, cling to your brother

    Right, this is the first time a Black Man has run for President.

    and leave us true Clintonians alone, jeeez!! Enough already!

    You exist? WOW! I heard that a couple of families saw bright lights in the sky, a neck poke up out of a lake and a big hairy creature in the woods - but WOW!

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500