Rice on Race

March 30th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Via Power Line comes the news that US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice commented on the issue of race in America last week in her meeting with the Washington Times editorial board. She had quite some interesting things to say: she speaks about this difficult subject, and the role race played in her life, in quite a moving manner.

“Black Americans were a founding population,” she said. “Africans and Europeans came here and founded this country together — Europeans by choice and Africans in chains. That’s not a very pretty reality of our founding.

As a result, Miss Rice told editors and reporters at The Washington Times, “descendants of slaves did not get much of a head start, and I think you continue to see some of the effects of that.

“That particular birth defect makes it hard for us to confront it, hard for us to talk about it, and hard for us to realize that it has continuing relevance for who we are today,” she said…

But she spoke forcefully on the subject, citing personal and family experience to illustrate “a paradox and contradiction in this country,” which “we still haven’t resolved.”

On the one hand, she said, race in the U.S. “continues to have effects” on public discussions and “the deepest thoughts that people hold.” On the other, “enormous progress” has been made, which allowed her to become the nation’s chief diplomat.

“America doesn’t have an easy time dealing with race,” Miss Rice said, adding that members of her family have “endured terrible humiliations.”

“What I would like understood as a black American is that black Americans loved and had faith in this country even when this country didn’t love and have faith in them — and that’s our legacy,” she said.

Scott Mirengoff also recommends this article, so do I.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. C Stanley
    March 30th, 2008 at 17:48
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Her remarks are incredibly poignant, IMO. Rather than resenting the history of black enslavement, she chooses to simply point out that blacks helped build America, and not by choice, and they got a very raw deal out of it (even after emancipation, since they then truly didn’t have an even playing field to start on.) This encourages us as white Americans to reflect on that reality, without the accompanying feeling that we’re being told that we bear individual guilt over those past injustices. It also, I would think, would make a black American incredibly proud rather than feel that they should be encouraged to dwell on victimhood.

  2. L Porter
    March 31st, 2008 at 18:38
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I understand Black Americans hardship and respect them and their heritage.  In todays world we hear more of the Black Americans having issues on Race then White Americans. I heard one Black American women indicate that it was the Black Americans being uncomfortable about their own race. I watch Black American shows and the shows are always mentioning their color. A lot of black American songs mention their color. I think Balck Americans need to focus on White and Black being one group and stop looking at the differenes. If we raise our children with out pointing out differences maybe they will not see the differnces. Not all White Americans had it easy. My family was very poor. My family had many struggles. We need to stop looking at Whites, Blacks or any other color and learn to love each other for what we are. I am a White American. I do not look at other colors as being any differnet then a person with red hair, a person with glasses, a person that is larger and so on. We all have our difference and Thank God for that. What a boring place we would be other wise. Please stop introducing our children to negetivity and stop showing our children the strength we can have in America. If not for our children ut our grandchildrens , children.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500