Democrats Criticize McCain over Economy

Filed under: 2008 elections, Economy, United States, Videos — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on March 28, 2008 @ 10:00 pm CET

If John McCain has one major weakness (not his age) it’s the economy. He has admitted in recent months that he really doesn’t know much about this subject, and that he’s dependent on good advisers for a good economic policy as president. Not only that, McCain has also flip-flopped on, say, the Bush tax cuts. Where he was a moderate with regards to spending and taxing once, he has moved significantly to the right ever since he announced he would run for president.

The Democrats understand all the above as well and have decided to take McCain on over the economy:

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

1 Comment »

  1. 1 Bill W

    March 29, 2008 @ 4:32 pm CET

    I am afraid that the dem talking points about McCain and the economy are already accepted wisdom, even though incorrect.  

    He did not say he doesn’t know much about the subject, just that it is one area that he would like to know better, and it was in a wide ranging interview on the fact that he wants to surround himself with good advisers, and not yes men:

    http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/mccain_he_wants_people_to_tell.html
    "The issue of economics is something that I’ve really never understood as well as I should. I understand the basics, the fundamentals, the vision, all that kind of stuff,” he said. "But I would like to have someone I’m close to that really is a good strong economist. As long as Alan Greenspan is around I would certainly use him for advice and counsel."

    McCain said his staff hates it when he discusses his shortcomings on economics, even though he has read widely and studied the subject.

    His economic vision - less government, less spending, less taxes - still sound much better to me than Clinton’s & Obama’s knee jerk reaction to the credit issue - government bailout, government regulation, create new government bureaucracies.    And I think I would put his knowledge of economics up against theirs any day. 

    I do not want to live in a nanny state.  I want free markets to figure this out, and they do.  We had "irrational exuberance" in the stock market in the late ’90’s which led to short term economic crisis & correction in early part of this decade, and this credit crunch will pass too - and hopefully in the process will flush a few financial institutions that were getting too fancy with their "financial instruments" and risk taking down the toilet.  Prosecution if any of them broke laws by hiding the risks they were taking.  That is a "market correction" that has some lasting impact - shareholders will demand better protections from the surviving institutions, and punish them with low stock prices - just as they did to Enron and other firms that even smelled like Enron after the stock bubble burst.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Chris: Ron Paul would get peace in our time.
  • kbn: Lets not forget to pray for our political leaders to make the right decisions. What is wrong with these...
  • Ron Paulian: George Washington warned of entangling alliances; perhaps he was referring to the entangling alliances...
  • Interested: And it’s also the sort of gaffe that feeds into fears about McCain’s age…ie is his memory starting...
  • Interested: fire both of them would be fine for me. Stewart’s humor isn’t particularly intelligent, and...

Partners