Saddam Paid For Trip US Lawmakers

Filed under: Iraq, Middle East, United States — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on March 27, 2008 @ 3:00 pm CET

The AP reports (as Jason noticed earlier today as well) that “Saddam Hussein’s intelligence agency secretly financed a trip to Iraq for three U.S. lawmakers during the run-up to the U.S.-led invasion,” according to federal prosecutors. The trip was arranged by Muthanna Al-Hanooti “who was charged Wednesday with setting up the junket at the behest of Saddam’s regime. Iraqi intelligence officials allegedly paid for the trip through an intermediary and rewarded Al-Hanooti with 2 million barrels of Iraqi oil.”

Here’s what happened: Al-Hanooti needed some anti-war politicians to travel to Iraq as to put pressure on the US government not to attack Saddam. Saddam had to look good. Or at least not bad. So he looked around a bit and decided that Democratic lawmakers Reps. Jim McDermott of Washington, David Bonior of Michigan and Mike Thompson of California were ideal targets.

He told them that if they’d go to Iraq, the trip would be paid for by “Life for Relief and Development, a charity formed after the first Gulf War to fund humanitarian work in Iraq.”

In reality, however, the trip was paid for by Saddam Hussein’s intelligence service.

So the American lawmakers went to Iraq and they did exactly what Saddam wanted them to do: they tried to convince the American public that Bush was lying, that Saddam could be trusted, and so on. Because of his anti-war and pro-Iraq stance, McDermott was dubbed “Baghdad Jim” by conservatives.

None of the lawmakers are accused of committing any crimes / breaking any laws. Despite what Dan Riehl thinks, not knowing is in these cases actually a good defense. Legally, it was perfectly acceptable for them to think that the charity paid for their trip.

That doesn’t necessarily excuse their behavior morally or politically of course. One could argue that it’s still a sign of incompetence, at least. Or as Jason put it: “useful idiots.”

Al-Hanooti is currently in prison; he’s being held on $100,000 bail. He “pleaded not guilty Wednesday to charges of conspiracy to act as an unregistered agent of a foreign government, illegally purchasing Iraqi oil and lying to authorities.”

Lastly, Michelle Malkin links to this article:

Saddam’s Cash
From the May 5, 2003 issue: And the journalists and politicians he bought with it.
by Stephen F. Hayes
05/05/2003, Volume 008, Issue 33

Editor’s note, 1/30/04: On January 25, 2004, a daily newspaper in Iraq called al Mada published a list of individuals and organizations who it says received oil from the now-deposed regime. Among those listed is Shakir al Khafaji, an Iraqi-American from Detroit, who ran “Expatriate Conferences” for the regime in Baghdad. Al Khafaji also contributed $400,000 to the production of Scott Ritter’s film “In Shifting Sands.” Finally, al Khafaji arranged travel and financing for the “Baghdad Democrats”–Jim McDermott, Mike Thompson and David Bonior–last fall. Following the trip, al Khafaji contributed $5,000 to McDermott’s Legal Defense Fund. THE WEEKLY STANDARD has contacted McDermott’s office about returning the contribution. McDermott spokesman Mike Decesare said this morning that he had not yet spoken with McDermott, since it’s three hours earlier on the West Coast. Asked about the contribution and the subsequent allegations about al Khafaji and oil, Decesare said, “I don’t know anything about it.” THE WEEKLY STANDARD will post a response from McDermott’s office as soon as we get one. In the meantime, it’s worth taking a second look at “Saddam’s Cash.”

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • v. gates: Homosexuality is choice; one can opt to believe one is a homosexual or one can opt otherwise. Lots of...
  • wilky: It is what it is Michael. Its been this way since I started reading the papers way back in 1967. The...
  • Michael Merritt: The best way to make families a non-issue is probably to ignore those who are making them an...
  • PhilosopherP: IF it is true, and that seems to be far from certain, they need to watch the old movie "But...
  • Michael Merritt: You know I’m a critic of the media, and have even defended Palin against some of the grossly...

Partners