Filed under: 2008 elections, Al Gore — Jason, Managing Editor on March 25, 2008 @ 4:13 pm CET
In a move that highlights the potential for mass chaos at the Democratic Convention, Florida Congressman Tim Mahoney is floating the idea of a super-delegate coalition throwing both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama overboard in favor of…wait for it…Al Gore.
While much has been made by the Obama camp of the destructiveness of super-delegates frustrating the will of 51% of Democratic primary voters, the potential of frustrating the will of 100% of Democratic primary voters would be infinitely worse.
And the prospect of yet another droning, preachy Al Gore campaign is enough to make moderates run screaming for the exits from a Democratic Party that currently holds a significant advantage among this critical swing demographic.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments
policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or
willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email.
1 Claudia
March 25, 2008 @ 4:45 pm CETWell, that’s cute and all, but besides it being utterly absurd, it’s mathematically impossible. There are 795 superdelegates, so even if 100% of them went with Gore (in itself, a pipe-dream) they wouldn’t have the numbers to overthrow the pledged delegates of either candidate.
Of course technically the pledged delegates could defect at the convention and go with the superdelegate third candidate. Oh and also Obama and Clinton could divorce their spouses, declare that they are getting eloped, and then run a unified ticket, with the first and second slot based on the toss of a Cuban penny and the pledge to make Bush Secretary of Defense.
It’s gotta be something in that Florida air…
2 C Stanley
March 25, 2008 @ 5:06 pm CETHeh. Wouldn’t this be an echo of the 1952 convention where the delegates drafted Adlai Stevenson? That was before my time but from what I understand, there’s some similarity in the appeal of Stevenson and that of Gore, to academic types while they’re not very well liked among the blue collars and ‘common folk’, too.
3 Out of Control Super-Delegates | Two Superb
March 25, 2008 @ 5:33 pm CET[…] Jamais Cascio wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptIn a move that highlights the potential for mass chaos at the Democratic Convention, Florida Congressman Tim Mahoney is floating the idea of a super-delegate coalition throwing both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama overboard in favor … Tags: bowl super, super ticket, super […]
4 Tully
March 25, 2008 @ 8:13 pm CET!!!!SuperDelegates Gone Wild!!!!
I can hardly wait for all the late-night commercials for the DVD series, complete to CGI electro-pasties.
5 kritter
March 25, 2008 @ 8:24 pm CETI actually would like Gore the best out of the three, but can see that he has limited appeal among the masses. Though I also would have voted for Adlai, if I was alive in 1952. That being said, its not a viable solution to the Democratic nomination mess. The Democrats are very short-sightedly burning themselves out in the primary fights, instead of concentrating on the real contest.
6 C Stanley
March 25, 2008 @ 8:40 pm CETTully: I think Spitzer was to have starred in that one, but they’re having to rework the title now.
7 wj
March 25, 2008 @ 10:08 pm CETWell, one difference from 1952: Stevenson really was drafted — in the sense that he, like most viable potential candidates for the Democrats, didn’t particularly want to run. All of them were well aware that the Democrats had no chance against Eisenhower, no matter who they ran. What he was doing was helping his party avoid a nasty internal fight.
In 2008, in contrast, lots of people expect that the Democrats can win the election (although they might yet manage to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory). I could see Gore deciding to do the noble and self-sacrificing thing and run, if the Democrats were essentially in a position of waiting until the stellar Republican candidate was out of office. But McCain, no matter how much one likes him, is not an overwhelming favorite going in. And I can’t see Gore taking another run where he would be expected to make a serious effort to win an office that I suspect he is just as happy to have avoided.