Dutch Muslim Channel Offers to Air “Fitna”

Filed under: General News — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on March 25, 2008 @ 3:14 pm CET

This is hilarious: the only channel in the Netherlands that wants to broadcast Geert Wilders’ movie “Fitna” is… wait for it… the Dutch Muslim Channel (Nederlandse Moslim Omroep). When asked whether that isn’t a little bit strange, a spokesman for the channel said that he doesn’t find it strange at all; the channel frequently allows Islamcritics to say what’s on their minds.

Wilders, however, isn’t pleased. Where he said a few months ago that if a channel wanted to broadcast his movie, they were allowed to watch it before airing it (as to be sure that it’s high quality, and that airing the film doesn’t break any laws), he now changed his tune: the NMO wants to broadcast “Fitna,” but it wants to watch the movie first… which is logical considering the fact that most networks want to know what they’re broadcasting. Anyhoo; suddenly Wilders says “no, you can’t watch it.”

In other words: Wilders doesn’t want the NMO to broadcast “Fitna.” That much is clear. Theirs is not an unreasonable demand. Wilders should put his film where his mouth is.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

5 Comments »

  1. 1 Claudia

    March 25, 2008 @ 4:29 pm CET

    It’s a stroke of sheer brilliance on the part of NMO. What better way to combat the affirmations of Wilder than by showing yourself to be perfectly willing to tolerate criticism? NMO is probably also more inmune to being accused of "Islamophobia" since it’s a Muslim channel. I’ve always thought that the best way, indeed the ONLY way, Muslims could fight this would be to allow the movie to air, and then have nothing happen. No treats, no riots, no killing, maybe some angry letters to the editor like normal regular people do. That would defeat Wilders, anything else will only reinforce his message.

  2. 2 Steve Real

    March 25, 2008 @ 5:14 pm CET

    Leave it to the European Muslim community to stand up for free speech in the face of corporate cowardice.

    They may not like the film
    but they have more "galvones" then
    the cowards at Network Solutions.

    Who’s defending the Freedom of Speech?
    Well…
    it ain’t the CEO of Network Solutions.
    He’s nothing but a coward.

    good luck

  3. 3 Macsmind

    March 25, 2008 @ 6:37 pm CET

    FITNA Released!…

    Network Solutions be darned, FITNA the Movie is hitting the internet.
    Here is the director, Geert Wilders getting interviewed by Fox News.

    Bloggers copy the code, pass it around.
    Here also is the film maker, Geert Wilders Film Festival site.
    UPD…

  4. 4 Wilders Having Some Trouble | Outsider On The Inside

    March 27, 2008 @ 4:22 pm CET

    […] does have options, however, if he indeed still intends to air his movie before April 1st.  The country’s Muslim […]

  5. 5 Gutsy

    March 29, 2008 @ 1:17 pm CET

    This is not what Wilders wanted to do. What he wanted was to have the NMO declare that the film doesnt break any laws and is acceptable material. If a Muslim organization declares this, this helps a lot. Thats why he told NMO that that must "make sure"  (in other words, accept and confirm) that the film doesnt break any laws. This kind of thing would be helpful in many ways obviously, if a muslim organization "approves" the film. That was his goal.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • v. gates: Homosexuality is choice; one can opt to believe one is a homosexual or one can opt otherwise. Lots of...
  • wilky: It is what it is Michael. Its been this way since I started reading the papers way back in 1967. The...
  • Michael Merritt: The best way to make families a non-issue is probably to ignore those who are making them an...
  • PhilosopherP: IF it is true, and that seems to be far from certain, they need to watch the old movie "But...
  • Michael Merritt: You know I’m a critic of the media, and have even defended Palin against some of the grossly...

Partners