The US: An Unreliable Ally

March 14th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

HACER (Hispanic American Center for Economic Research) published an article that first appeared at the Economist about how the Democrats’ anti-NAFTA and anti-free trade rhetoric is hurting America’s image in, especially, both Canada and Mexico (but also in other - especially Latin American - countries).

Officials in both countries want more economic integration, not less. Mexican ministers worry that the Democrats’ rhetoric plays into the hands of the unreconstructed segments of their country’s left. Last month these groups organised a protest, attended by tens of thousands of farmers, against NAFTA. Even though commodity prices are at record highs, the farmers worry that the final ending of import tariffs on maize and beans this year will hurt their livelihoods by opening the way to subsidised American imports…

Cyclical slowdowns are one thing. What depresses politicians in both countries is their biggest trading partner’s protectionist mood. A Mexican minister who is a strong supporter of NAFTA and who has been dealing with Washington for the past two decades says that on a recent visit to the United States’ Congress he found an “almost xenophobic” mood of a kind that he had never before encountered.

That chimes with the frustrations of Colombia’s government, which having negotiated a free-trade agreement with the United States has found it blocked by the Democrats in Congress. The message from the Democratic campaign is that “America is an unreliable ally”, says a veteran Latin American diplomat who spent many years working closely with the United States’ government.

It’s interesting to see the party that constantly bashed George W. Bush for doing great damage to America’s image and thus popularity are doing the exact same thing, albeit in a slightly different way. Clinton and Obama are, suddenly, talking the isolationist talk, this while other countries are slowly opening up their borders and learning that being a partner of the US helps themselves as well as the US itself.

The message the Democrats are sending is indeed that the US is an unreliable ally.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. PatHMV
    March 14th, 2008 at 21:58
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Exactly, Michael. The same folks who extol the virtues of "soft power" seem to think little of utterly undermining that soft power by telling the poor and unfortunate of friendly nations: "Forget about you, I’ve got some steel workers to protect!"

  2. Jay_C
    March 15th, 2008 at 15:57
    Reply | Quote | #2

    "the Democrats’ anti-NAFTA and anti-free trade rhetoric is hurting America’s image in, especially, both Canada and Mexico (but also in other - especially Latin American - countries). "

    It;s not suprising to me that the countries that benefit most from NATFA are upset with the rhetoric.  I find some of the ideas agains NAFTA quite compelling actually…  I think the article is wrong saying this is a democrat thing.   I know quite a few Republicans and Independents that are against it as well…

  3. Jay_C
    March 15th, 2008 at 16:00
    Reply | Quote | #3

    This does not make us an unreliable ally. Everything doesn’t hinge on NAFTA…We as seperate countries work to achieve many of the same goals.

  4. HiFly
    March 16th, 2008 at 19:31
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Could NAFTA be the worst agreement ever to sell the american worker down the toilet? How do you compete against a third world country that has no concept environmental regulation or what it is like to replace $22 and hour workers with  $2 dollar an hour slave wages. Ok well some of you might say you can live in Mexico on $2 dollars an hour no problem… Go do it!

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500