<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Military Protesters to &#8216;Imprison&#8217; Recruiters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poligazette.com/2008/03/12/anti-military-protesters-to-imprison-recruiters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/03/12/anti-military-protesters-to-imprison-recruiters/</link>
	<description>News and Analysis from Different Moderate Perspectives</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: michelle malkin</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/03/12/anti-military-protesters-to-imprison-recruiters/#comment-32175</link>
		<dc:creator>michelle malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/03/12/anti-military-protesters-to-imprison-recruiters/#comment-32175</guid>
		<description>[...] Christian group whose leaders have openly questioned Israel's right to ethunderpigblog.blogspot.comAnti-Military Protesters to ???Imprison?? Recruiters - PoliGazetteMichelle Malkin describes to the long history of anti-military activities by far-left activists. It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christian group whose leaders have openly questioned Israel&#8217;s right to ethunderpigblog.blogspot.comAnti-Military Protesters to ???Imprison?? Recruiters - PoliGazetteMichelle Malkin describes to the long history of anti-military activities by far-left activists. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/03/12/anti-military-protesters-to-imprison-recruiters/#comment-31564</link>
		<dc:creator>john hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/03/12/anti-military-protesters-to-imprison-recruiters/#comment-31564</guid>
		<description>[...] not religious, you'll be doing the bare minimum to get in the pearly gates? Dowww.uncorrelated.comAnti-Military Protesters to ???Imprison?? Recruiters - PoliGazetteI??m with John Hawkins who writes: ???Those are not the actions of people who support the troops, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not religious, you&#8217;ll be doing the bare minimum to get in the pearly gates? Dowww.uncorrelated.comAnti-Military Protesters to ???Imprison?? Recruiters - PoliGazetteI??m with John Hawkins who writes: ???Those are not the actions of people who support the troops, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay_C</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/03/12/anti-military-protesters-to-imprison-recruiters/#comment-30868</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/03/12/anti-military-protesters-to-imprison-recruiters/#comment-30868</guid>
		<description>I agree that some are anti-military, but not the majority. The problem, in my alternate but equal opinion, is that a vocal minority of anti-war, anti-military folks are drowning out the silent majority of anti-war, pro military folks. I’ll give you that &#34;what is heard&#34; (even being from the minority), is what forms perception. But the thing is, perception although convenient to use when supporting an argument, is not fact. Basing a logical argument on a premise coming from perception or personal opinion, and not fact, may make your line of reasoning correct but unless it is based on fact, it doesn't make that argument correct. I would think we would need a Sociologist to take the time to perform a study, analyze the data, and present the results to us to get a real answer to who is right.   As far as your analysis of the post, I agree in that some do seem to beleive that &lt;em&gt;the military&lt;/em&gt; isn’t considered to be &lt;em&gt;useful&lt;/em&gt; by these individuals, however, it doesn't prove your argument, any more than it does mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that some are anti-military, but not the majority. The problem, in my alternate but equal opinion, is that a vocal minority of anti-war, anti-military folks are drowning out the silent majority of anti-war, pro military folks. I’ll give you that &quot;what is heard&quot; (even being from the minority), is what forms perception. But the thing is, perception although convenient to use when supporting an argument, is not fact. Basing a logical argument on a premise coming from perception or personal opinion, and not fact, may make your line of reasoning correct but unless it is based on fact, it doesn&#8217;t make that argument correct. I would think we would need a Sociologist to take the time to perform a study, analyze the data, and present the results to us to get a real answer to who is right.   As far as your analysis of the post, I agree in that some do seem to beleive that <em>the military</em> isn’t considered to be <em>useful</em> by these individuals, however, it doesn&#8217;t prove your argument, any more than it does mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  is_writable() [<a href='function.is-writable'>function.is-writable</a>]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in <b>/home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php</b> on line <b>500</b><br />
