McCain: Nafta Worthy of Support

Filed under: 2008 elections, Canada, Feature, John McCain, United States — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on March 2, 2008 @ 12:08 pm CET

Senator for Arizona John McCain reacted to Barack Obama’s constant bashing of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) by saying that the trade deal is worthy of support. He also blasted Obama and Hillary Clinton (who’s also critical of NAFTA in its current shape) by saying that their anti-NAFTA rhetoric may very well “threaten Canada’s contribution to the war in Afghanistan.”

It’s interesting to see that the two candidates of the party that constantly talks about how George W. Bush has destroyed America’s image in the world, are - it seems - determined to destroy the (few) good relationships America still has.

McCain clearly understands that America can’t afford to alienate Canada and Mexico, and he’s - in turn - determined to make this clear to both countries involved.

“I want to tell our Canadian friends that I will negotiate and conclude free trade agreements and I will not, after entering into solemn agreements, go and say that I will abrogate those agreements,” McCain said. “Every time in history we have practised protectionism, we have paid a very heavy price for it.”

And that’s quite true. Obama and Clinton may call for protectionism because it’s the popular thing to do right now, but it won’t help America one bit. In fact, breaking with NAFTA is likely to cause the US considerable damage.

Perhaps Obama and Clinton should lead on this issue and not just tell certain - ignorant - voters what they want to hear.

McCain also illustrates that he understands that foreign policy isn’t about ‘helping’ someone else, it’s about helping each other. You only help a country, you only deal with a country, because doing so is in your own interest. The same goes, of course, for the other country involved.

Anyway, this means that if a country like the United States threatens to break with an important treaty (for Canada), Canada in its turn may very well threaten to break with the US on an issue that matters greatly to itself. That’s how the world works.

“One of the greatest assets we have in Afghanistan today, frankly, are our Canadian friends,” McCain said in this regard. “It’s very controversial in Canada, their commitment and suffering and the losses they have faced. We need their continued support in Afghanistan,” he added.

At this point in time, McCain is the only candidate behaving like a (future) president.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.

1 Barack Obama » McCain: Nafta Worthy of Support

March 2, 2008 @ 1:26 pm CET

[…] Democratic Central wrote an interesting post today on McCain: Nafta Worthy of SupportHere’s a quick excerptSenator for Arizona John McCain reacted to Barack Obama’s constant bashing … He also blasted Obama and Hillary Clinton (who’s also critical… […]

2 Jay_C

March 3, 2008 @ 4:43 am CET

Two developments to make a case against NAFTA
1) Bush’s plan to regularize the flow of Mexicans into the United States and grant a still-vague legitimacy to illegals.
2) In 2004 news spread that General Motors was to put it nicely was “uncompetitive” versus foreign made cars, even with the huge cash rebates and other incentives it’s used to help sales, it also gave away 1000 of its cars and trucks. Since then things have not improved. Their sales numbers as we saw recently are getting embarrasingly worse.Almost 15 years after it went into effect, NAFTA has failed to achieve its two major objectives:1) Improve life for the typical Mexican to slow down the flow of illegals into the U.S. 2) Strengthening U.S. industry to help it increase market share at home and abroad, and boost the living standards of American workers.
In addition, NAFTA supporters talk about increased U.S.-Mexican trade and investment flows, and about the 1990s boom that followed NAFTA, forgetting that expanding trade in an economic relationship has no importance independent of the structure of trade itself and its financial sustainability. I agree that some NAFTA opponents have made up some stories as well. Just as NAFTA could not have sparked the ’90s boom, its effects are not the "root of all evil" in a U.S. economy bigger than North American trade. And Mexico had no choice but to increase exports and assimilate itself more thoroughly with the United States. That being said, a good test of NAFTA’s success, should be economic change and reforms to encourage more Mexicans to stay in Mexico. I’m not seeing that, overall I am seeing the opposite.I agree that China (and I’ll add India) are other Countries where our jobs are being lost. According to that USA today article, 39 million jobs outside of manufacturing may have been created in that time in the USA, but where are these jobs? More service sector jobs I presume? (You want fries with that?) Have illegals taken any of these jobs?