Well Done Drudge

February 29th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Well done Matt Drudge. Drudge seemingly couldn’t care less that the British media and government had decided on a news blackout in order to protect Prince Harry and to enable him to serve on the frontline in Afghanistan. Druge blew Prince Harry’s cover (see below the fold for Drudge’s headline) and, now, the British army is preparing to evacuate him ASAP.

Here’s Drudge’s headline:

harrydrudge.jpg

Now, in case you’re wondering why they’re evacuating Harry, the reason is that he’s a prime target of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. He was serving anonymously on the frontline. He was doing what his ancestors had done as well; fighting along side their soldiers.

The British media had agreed to a voluntary news blackout until the end of his term. After the three month tour, they’d write about it.

Drudge, being careless or only interested in the money in his own pocket, was unwilling to play by those rules and decided to publish the news nonetheless.

Prince Harry now has to be evacuated because he and his fellow soldiers are at great risk (the Taliban are, of course, willing to do whatever it takes to capture Harry).

In a pre-prepared interview that was meant to be broadcast after his return, the prince acknowledged that his presence could be dangerous for other soldiers. “I think there’s a lot of guys here who hopefully won’t be targeted, but as I say now that this film has been made and now … people will know I’m out here no doubt I’ll be a top target.”

More here (with video).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Dylan
    February 29th, 2008 at 17:11
    Reply | Quote | #1

    To be fair, Michael, Drudge didn’t break the news, he only reported what was already being reported in Australia. The media blackout was a British agreement and no one told the Aussie magazine and nobody made any agreement with Drudge, either.

  2. John Brill
    February 29th, 2008 at 21:31
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Why well done? The man wanted to serve his country and prove his worth. That was taken away from him to no good end.

  3. PatHMV
    February 29th, 2008 at 21:48
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Um, John, I’m pretty sure that the headline from Michael was what we call sarcasm.

  4. Jay_C
    February 29th, 2008 at 21:58
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I applaud Prince Harry for fighting along side the other soldiers.  But as far as this media blackout.  I’m not claiming that this particular story should or should not have been leaked, but in general if this news was blacked out until recently, it makes you wonder what other stories the Media keeps under wraps?  Overall, is this supression a good or a bad thing, and who gets to decide?

  5. Claudia
    February 29th, 2008 at 23:02
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Interesting Michael, this could be the first time I see you agreeing with Shaun about anything.

    I agree with the both of you, incidentally. I’m no fan of monarchies, but it seems like the guy was actually making himself useful, and the media blackout was well justified. Drudge has contributed to endangering him and his comrades.

  6. PatHMV
    February 29th, 2008 at 23:35
    Reply | Quote | #6

    I’m with Dylan. I don’t see how you can blame Drudge for this, his own self-promotion notwithstanding. If it was in an Australian magazine, then it was out there, and if anybody in the British military was assuming it was still secret despite it being published in Australia, they’re fool-hardy.

  7. Michael van der Galien
    February 29th, 2008 at 23:45
    Reply | Quote | #7

    It’s not true. the Australian newspaper had it on as "rumors" but that’s it. Drudge gave far more specific information. Besides that, the magazines in question were… not exactly reputable as I understand it.

  8. michaelreynolds
    February 29th, 2008 at 23:56
    Reply | Quote | #8

    This was low and contemptible.  If Drudge were a member of the "liberal" media, conservatives would be screaming "treason!"  Instead — aside from Michael VdG — they stay mum.Harry is a mensch.  Drudge is a schmuck.

  9. Chris
    March 1st, 2008 at 00:08
    Reply | Quote | #9

    Well my first reaction was "scumbag"  (referring to Drudge)

  10. Patrick Murphy
    March 1st, 2008 at 06:50

    Did anyone notice what was on the ball cap the Prince was wearing during his interviews with CNN?  Check it out, you may be VERY suprised!

  11. Michael Kelly
    March 1st, 2008 at 14:09

    The opportunity for Harry to spend more time discovering himself has been blown by a bunch of tabloid guttersnipes. Whatever is reported on the British tabloids, they at least honoured an agreement. The foreign media could not even begin to understand that nor do they care.
    Where are the royal equivalents from the US?  Not in the line of danger that is certain

  12. kritter
    March 1st, 2008 at 16:40

    I agree with Michael and Chris. Drudge should have honored the blackout, so that Harry could have remained in Afghanistan. BTW, I admire his willingness to serve in this way, and the British media’s conspiratorial efforts to protect him.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500