‘Virtual Fence’ Along Border To Be Delayed

February 28th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Bad news for immigration hawks (in the US): ‘ The Bush administration has scaled back plans to quickly build a “virtual fence” along the U.S.-Mexico border, delaying completion of the first phase of the project by at least three years and shifting away from a network of tower-mounted sensors and surveillance gear.’

“Technical problems discovered in a 28-mile pilot project south of Tucson prompted the change in plans,” the WaPo reports.

When asked about it, ‘authorities confirmed that Project 28, the initial deployment of the Secure Border Initiative network, did not work as planned or meet the needs of the U.S. Border Patrol.’

As the newspaper points out, the ‘announcement marked a major setback for what President Bush in May 2006 called “the most technologically advanced border security initiative in American history.” The virtual fence was to be a key component of his proposed overhaul of U.S. immigration policies, which died last year in the Senate.’

And it will, most surely, anger a whole bunch of immigration hawks.

As it is, though, I don’t quite see how this fence will add much to the security of the United States. Aside from that, it seems to me that it also costs a whole lot of money. One wonders whether there aren’t other projects the US government can use that money for.

Projects that actually accomplish something.

All in all, the news means that ‘the first phase will not be completed until near the end of the next president’s first term.’

2008 elections question: will this help McCain / the Republicans? After all, they can make it a number one issue again.

Immigration problem question: will this, perhaps, enable McCain to finally convince the base that trying to get rid of all immigration is a pipedream and that it’s best to focus on trying to make it more easy for people to migrate to the US legally?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. TheGuy
    February 28th, 2008 at 17:42
    Reply | Quote | #1

    The word you kept forgetting was "illegal" as in "illegal immigration"

    Fences aren’t put up for legal immigrants.

  2. C Stanley
    February 28th, 2008 at 18:05
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I think it could actually hurt McCain, because he’s promised the immigration hawks that he’ll ‘build the d#mn fence’. They were reluctant to believe that he was serious about it, and this shows that it’s unlikely that he’ll be able to do it in a reasonable length of time and will increase their doubts that it’ll ever happen.

  3. casualobserver
    February 28th, 2008 at 21:53
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I don’t know cs, impugning a politician for technical issues? I’d like to think not.

    Besides with Arizona taking its own lead on improved employer enforcement, we may get to see the more effective solution first.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500