Serb Grief Over Kosovo Runs Deep

February 25th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:
Leave a comment | Trackback

The New York Times reports that nationalist hooligans “may have been behind the torching of the United States Embassy here, but the feelings of anger, sorrow and betrayal over the loss of Kosovo cut across all segments of Serbian society.”

As the NYT points out, the world is waiting to see whether those riots were “the final spasm of anger in Serbia or the first tremor in a new Balkan earthquake.” Those who only know a little about the Balkan - and I consider myself to be one of them since I’m not a specialist nor an amateur specialist (yeah yeah, I know) - know that it’s an instable part of the world and that it’s not exactly difficult to make Balkan peoples start raping, plundering and killing. They’ve got a violent past and will probably have a violent future.

In short: it’s an extremely volatile part of the world. One seemingly small thing can set off a fire. The independence of Kosovo isn’t exactly a small thing, so it’s not difficult to believe that this may result in tremendous chaos.

Back to the article: it’s a good read. The NYT explains well how Serbs think about Kosovo’s independence. It’s a highly emotional issue for Serbs. This isn’t something most of them will “get over” any time soon.

The American ambassador, meanwhile, can be “angry” about the violence committed by Serbs but this is what they should have expected, especially considering the fact that America and the EU have basically written Kosovo’s constitution and were, thus, deeply involved in the matter.

  1. Serb Grief Over Kosovo Runs Deep
    February 25th, 2008 at 15:33
    #1
  2. sashal
    February 25th, 2008 at 19:25
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Michael and Jason, here is an interesting take on the Kosovo problem from the Russian point of view and the relationships between USA and Russia in this regard , check it out, please…

    http://www.takimag.com/site/article/kosovo_and_the_last_grasps_of_american_unipolarity/

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.