US giving ‘best possible intelligence’ against PKK

February 21st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Turkish Daily News reports that the US State Department has said that ‘it was working to provide Turkey with the “best possible intelligence” in the fight against the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and called for more cooperation between Ankara and the Iraqis, implying that Washington’s opposition to a Turkish ground offensive remained in place.’

What’s remarkable about this admission is that, at first, the US didn’t want to say whether it shared it’s intelligence with Turkey or not. It even denied it to a certain extent. The reason for that approach was, of course, that the US doesn’t want to risk losing the support of Kurds in northern Iraq.

But now the US is open about it. This means, it seems, that the US is either not afraid of a Kurdish backlash (because it won’t come) or that the US fears a massive Turkish invasion more than it fears Kurdish anger. It’s probably the second.

What’s also interesting about this development is that there are pro-Kurdish members of the Bush administration who, for a long time, prevented the US from cooperating with Turkey in its war against the PKK. They seem to have lost the internal debate now.

All very good developments indeed.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Xalo
    February 26th, 2008 at 18:04
    Reply | Quote | #1

    How much money this operation is costing turkey ? how many lifes ? what does it do to the relation between Turks and Kurds in turkey ? MORANS normally do not think about the consequeces of their action , You talk like you actually enjoy surprssing the nation of Kurdistan .

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500