That’s Just Great

Filed under: Asia, Feature, Pakistan, War on Terror — Michael van der Galien on February 20, 2008 @ 2:49 pm CET

Well, one gets the impression that the parties that won the elections in Pakistan this week do indeed represent change. Not the kind of change foreign policy haws were looking forward to though: “The winners of Pakistan’s parliamentary elections said Tuesday that they would take a new approach to fighting Islamic militants by pursuing more dialogue than military confrontation” with them.

Wonderful. We all know that talking solves all problems, especially when the problems are Islamic extremists. Come to think of it, why hasn’t the US ever tried to talk to, say, Osama Bin Laden after his minions destroyed the World Trade Center? I’m sure that would have payed off.

I mean, if you want to know just how effective “dialogue” is with these people I’d say just look at the situation in Palestine. It’s perfectly clear that all the “dialogue” with people like Yasser Arafat has truly improved the situation.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Kaspar: "George Wallace never threw a bomb," Lewis noted. "He never fired a gun, but he created the...
  • Nancy: The plan sets out to take decisive action using all available tools to support struggling financial...
  • dario: european are not stupid to believe Turks..they know the real terrorist is Turkey and PKK only defending its...
  • Blackstone: I heard strong rumours that the big "O" might be indicted for connections to money...
  • redfish: +-3%

Partners

 

Your Ad Here