Musharraf Suffers Major Defeat

February 19th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Even though Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf’s cronies have tried to rig the Pakistani elections to a degree, his party - the PML-Q - has lost the Parliamentary elections bigtime. Early results indicate that Benazir Bhutto’s party (the PPP) and Nawaz Sharif’s party (the PML-N) have won far more seats than expected:

he PML-N had won 29 and the PPP 27 National Assembly seats after, what were called unofficial results for 87 constituencies, were known well past midnight, until when the PML-Q had won only nine and NWFP-based Awami National Party seven while nine had gone to independents, mainly in the party-less Federally Administered Tribal Areas.

The MMA, which ruled the NWFP for five years, appeared in danger of being wiped out from both the National Assembly and the Frontier legislature.

The MMA is Pakistan’s Islamist party. They had a lot of electoral success only a couple of years ago, but after having lived under Islamist rule in certain parts of the country for a couple of years, Pakistanis realize that Islamists aren’t exactly a blessing.

More at Captain’s Quarters.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. marc moore
    February 19th, 2008 at 15:52
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I’d call this a pretty good outcome, given the circumstances.  Certainly could be a lot worse.

    "Pakistanis realize that Islamists aren’t exactly a blessing"

    Amen.

  2. Jason
    February 19th, 2008 at 16:41
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I found the fact that the ruling party willingly conceded defeat to be an interesting refutation of the overheated predictions of rigging and despotism that flowed freely from anti-Pakistan partisans such as Swaraaj Chauhan.  I’ve taken a more charitable view of Musharraf’s situation than many western (and non-western) analysts for some time, and this concession is an affirmation that such an approach might have been more correct

  3. Michael van der Galien
    February 19th, 2008 at 18:26
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I’ve taken a more charitable view of Musharraf’s situation than many western (and non-western) analysts for some time, and this concession is an affirmation that such an approach might have been more correct

    I agree with that. It seems to me that some are blinded by their prejudices.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500