Musharraf Rebuts Critics

Filed under: Asia, Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf — Jason, Managing Editor on February 19, 2008 @ 7:41 pm CET

Captain Ed highlights an additional positive outcome from the Pakistani elections — by accepting an unpleasant electoral outcome, Musharraf marginalizes the radical Islamists. There is also a corollary effect in western politics.  By accepting the negative result, Musharraf has definitely refuted the claims of many critics who cast him as a hopelessly corrupt despot.

To some such critics, anything Pakistan’s government could ever do would be seen in a negative light.  Theirs is not a project of analysis, but rather propaganda, centered on either enmity towards Pakistan or hatred of Musharraf for his cooperation with the Bush administration.  Indeed, more than a few anti-Musharraf rants have carried a bizarre seasoning of BDS, as if the complex welter of Pakistani politics could be reduced to the simplistic formulations of American politics.

But the acceptance of democracy even in the face of adversity is a sign of political maturity and a refutation of charges of despotism.  Congratulations are due Musharraf and skepticism is due to some of his more overheated critics, especially when they refuse to even acknowledge their own prior misreadings.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

1 Comment »

  1. 1 wj

    February 21, 2008 @ 12:48 am CET

    Actually, Pakistan’s voters had already marginalized the radical Islamists pretty thoroughly.  Musharraf’s acceptance of the election results only avoid going the way of those places (like Egypt) where radical Islamists gain because there is nowhere but the mosque where it is possible to oppose the government.

    But really.  Is refraining from gratuitously starting a wild fire the same as working to put one out?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • C Stanley: Cindy- funny, where I come from, hypocrisy also includes defending candidates from one party from personal...
  • basil:      Obama can call in all the woman to campaign for him but it won’t help him.  Obama had his...
  • Bob from Sarasota: This is the most inane sub piece I’ve ever seen…..photo (insert) is  not a picture of...
  • Morgan Walker: Fortunately, American Comedy is at its highest regarding McCain. HuffPost’s 236.com is going for...
  • Cindy: Rachel, They are "picking on her family" because her political points are in direct contrast to her...

Partners