Romney Takes Lead in VP Race

Filed under: 2008 elections, Feature, Mitt Romney, Republican Party — Alan Stewart Carl on February 15, 2008 @ 12:47 am CET

I’m not sure Mike Huckabee could have received worse news than Mitt Romney’s endorsement of John McCain. Not because Huckabee had a chance to get the Republican nomination (that miracle ain’t coming) but because Romney suddenly looks like the man at the top of McCain’s VP list.

Those of us McCain supporters on the more moderate side of things have known all along that the senator’s troubles with the Republican base would almost certainly result in a less-than-centrist VP choice. A lot of us have been thinking McCain would ultimately have to make nice with the social conservative wing and pick a guy like Huckabee. But with the anti-McCain vitriol coming from the conservative punditocracy (who are more big business/law-and-order oriented than they are religious), Romney now seems like the more likely compromise – an outcome made all the more likely by his willingness to play by party tradition and try to end the nomination process in orderly fashion.

McCain could still end up going another direction. They don’t call him a maverick for nothing. But if I were making odds, I’d place Romney at about even for the VP nod. For Romney, it puts him in perfect position to easily secure the nomination next go around. For McCain, it will quicken the healing process and give all those pundits who’ve painted themselves into a corner a sneaky way out. We’ll know soon enough if this is where everything’s headed.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

12 Comments »

  1. 1 Justin Gardner

    February 15, 2008 @ 2:50 am CET

    Interesting, but I don’t think Mitt is remotely interested in the VP position, so today wasn’t about that. He wants to run for Prez in 2012, ala Reagan. That’s how his speech at CPAC last week and this move today positions him. At least that’s my guess. :-)

  2. 2 ted

    February 15, 2008 @ 5:38 am CET

    I think R0mney would accept VP slot – NOT because he was intrested in that position — but because I think he feels this would be best for the ticket, for winning the election for McCain and, hence, the nation — to defeat the Dems.

  3. 3 Justin Gardner

    February 15, 2008 @ 6:40 am CET

    Ultimately, I don’t think Romney gives a damn what would be better for the ticket. Remember, in 1976 Reagan was offered the VP slot too and he turned it down. He too had his eyes trained on 1980, and even Romney’s staff has said he’s perfectly positioned for 2012. But I’ve been surprised before. Just my gut on it tells me no. He doesn’t want to be the Republican John Edwards.

  4. 4 Jay_C

    February 15, 2008 @ 1:44 pm CET

    I don’t think Romney really wants the VP spot either, he just endorsed McCain "for Republican party solidarity purposes" and to look like he is not a sore loser.  I don’t think McCain would offer him the spot either, they hate each other. (did you see that forced handshake moment at the endorsement, very awkward) I think it is possible that Romney would possibly take some other slot in a McCain administration (Economic Advisor) or something to that effect.  I also think Romney is looking to be POTUS in 2012.  I don’t think a McCain presidency will make it two terms, unless the American People see the War on Terror is more of an issue than the economy as we approach 2012.

  5. 5 C Stanley

    February 15, 2008 @ 2:10 pm CET

    I think it’s probably not about the VP slot too- and mostly agree with Justin, but I could see it either way. The only thing about the Reagan analogy though is that in this case, it might make more sense for Romney to consider accepting the VP position given that McCain’s age makes it unlikely that he’ll serve for two terms- so perhaps being second in line would make McCain’s VP the anointed one for 2012.

    In any case, McCain’s team is not giving any details about their short list for VP, and they’ve indicated that they definitely won’t make that decision until the Democratic nominee is known. My take on that is that it’ll probably be more about regional politics than about shoring up any particular part of the GOP base. I’m thinking if Hillary is the nominee, that perhaps FL becomes more important so maybe he’d go with Crist- and if it’s Obama, maybe someone from the upper midwest like Pawlenty. I think it’s going to be a matter of electoral politics- determining whether McCain’s main goal is to hold the red states or to try to turn some purple ones red.

  6. 6 Jay

    February 15, 2008 @ 10:19 pm CET

    I don’t care who you are or what you think - when you are asked to be VP, it is not likely you’ll say no, despite your future plans.

  7. 7 unitethegop.com

    February 16, 2008 @ 6:25 pm CET

    We want Romney for VP! Check out http://www.unitethegop.com
    Even with Romney’s Endorsement of McCain we need to send the message to the GOP and McCain that Conservatives still want Romney. If we continue to vote for him in the upcoming primaries we will be able to convey that message effectively. Romney continued to get votes even after his suspension, and I have NO DOUBT he will continue to get votes after the endorsement. This will continue to gain delegates for him, even though ultimately the delegates will most likely vote for McCain at the Convention. At which point, we hope we have a McCain-Romney ticket.

  8. 8 Jay

    February 17, 2008 @ 9:50 pm CET

    Well i think Romney is DEFINITELY running in 2012.  His making nice now hs gained him a lot of ground with the folks who mistrusted him as a political opportunist.

    The thing is, I’m relatively certain that McCain is a one-termer.  The guy is, after all, 71 years old.  So it’s possible Romney would take the VP slot if McCain admitted to him (privately of course) that he’d be the man in 4 years. But I think Romney would prefer to run as a washington outsider.  I also doubt if MCain would offer it to him.  He just doesn’t like the guy and there are other options to placate hard-core conservatives.

  9. 9 Rebecca

    February 18, 2008 @ 4:23 am CET

    I am sure that I read somewhere that McCain stated that he would only serve for one term .  That means if Rromney ran as his VP, then he would be a shoo-in for 2012.

    http://www.unitethegop.com is dedicated to getting Romney on the ballot for VP.  If you are interested, go check it out.The website has only been there a week and has had 10,000 visitors.

    See what you think.   :)

  10. 10 Denny

    February 19, 2008 @ 8:53 am CET

    I have offered 28 reasons why I think John McCain should pick former Mass. Governor Mitt Romney as his V.P. running mate. I do not think Romney would be so foolish as to turn this position down if McCain were smart enough to offer it to him.

    http://777denny.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/reason-27-why-john-mccain-should-pick-gov-romney-as-his-vp-now/

    Go McCain-Romney 2008!

  11. 11 ConservativeEdge

    February 24, 2008 @ 5:46 am CET

    We, at UniteTheGOP want Romney for President also. We also want him to represent conservative principles in the White House as our vice president on a McCain-Romney ticket. In fact, we are forming a political action committee (PAC) to help Romney become vice president in 2008 and the presidency in 2012. Come and join us and unite your voice with ours for a McCain-Romney victory in 2008.

  12. 12 hillplus

    February 26, 2008 @ 6:50 pm CET

    As much as I want Romney any way I can get him,  the VP spot is not traditionally a power spot. If Romney takes it and then McCain crashes and burns, then we don’t get what we ultimately want, that is Romney for president 2012.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Eric: Maybe Romney could win the election in 2012. Problem is, there is no difference between him, McCain and...
  • chris: I agree that there appears to be a big weight problem with these polls.  I’ve found that on average...
  • Kaspar: I think they only stopped booing because her daughter showed up, which is pretty basic decency. But they...
  • Thorsten Veblen: You say, quote, "Turkish police arrested a Kurdish woman", however nowhere in the link...
  • Polimom: Kaspar rather colorfully makes the correct point, Michael.   As far as I can tell, "Boos"...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here