A Feminist’s Regrets

February 9th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

Lori Gottlieb has written what can only be described as a soul-baring essay about her regrets over never having married.  Highly recommended reading, though many "liberated" women may have a difficult time acknowledging what Gottlieb has to say about her own misspent 20s and 30s.

Of course, we’d be loath to admit it in this day and age, but ask any soul-baring 40-year-old single heterosexual woman what she most longs for in life, and she probably won’t tell you it’s a better career or a smaller waistline or a bigger apartment. Most likely, she’ll say that what she really wants is a husband (and, by extension, a child).

To the outside world, of course, we still call ourselves feminists and insist—vehemently, even—that we’re independent and self-sufficient and don’t believe in any of that damsel-in-distress stuff, but in reality, we aren’t fish who can do without a bicycle, we’re women who want a traditional family.

Why loath to admit it?  The reality is that for most of us, men and women alike, need to partner up to get through life.  Friends and relatives are wonderful, of course, but there is nothing that can take the place of a committed spouse. 

It’s a little hard to read Ms. Gottlieb’s acknowledgment that she now realizes that she’s aging, lonely, and the proximate cause is her own choices in life.  It’s very personal and valuable for that reason.  There are many truths to be found in her article, some of which can be generalized to apply to our own lives so that, while our circumstances are very different, it could be possible to learn from her admitted mistakes.

Personally, my own decision to follow Jesus Christ came after a painful experience and the realization that the self-defined values I’d rigidly sought to live up to were ultimately worthless.  The truth is that, like Lori Gottlieb, I’d simply become old enough to recognize that self-deception is the ultimate lie.

Loath to admit it?  No, more like embarrassed at have been wrong for so long.

Read it all.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Orson Buggeigh
    February 10th, 2008 at 15:49
    Reply | Quote | #1

    So she finally figured out that biology wasn’t going to change to meet the expectations of the utopian feminists.  I asked the same question thirty years ago in high school when all this was the brilliant new thinking:  "How can anyone, man or woman, have it all, and all by him / her self?"  The answer is, of course, it is much easier to be part of a team.  Biologically, men and women complement each other. 

    I know some single-by-choice mothers, and I would say that by and large it strikes me as a less than ideal situation.  Most seem to make the same observations about having their time pretty well taken up with trying to do all the household work, all the parenting, and all the things involved with their work.  A friend who was a single (but not by choice) father remarked on many of the same issues.  He was very happy to re-marry and blend families, and it seems to have worked. 

    I know someone will have all the usual examples of wonderfully happy single by choice parents, etc, but I think Gottlieb’s experience is more in line with statistical reality.  Marriage works best for most people, and most children do better with both biological parents raising them. 

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500