Comments on: Bill Clinton, Global Warming Fool

By: Rodney Dierking

Rodney Dierking — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:12:00 +0000

Al Gore owns and is president of Generation Investment Management, his own carbon trading scam. Don’t take my word for it check it out for yourself.

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:27:14 +0000

This isn’t what Clinton said. See my post.

By: abrisaham

abrisaham — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:45:03 +0000

Isn’t that the beauty of democracy… candidates share their opinion on issues and we the voters get to pick who we align with most.

Yeah it is Tigere Wani. At last someone who gets the true democratic process.

In fact I like the way you put your support for Barak. Its the sound of a moderate supporting who he/she perceives as a moderate.

However all good things must come to an end. I have been threatened twice with banning for misconstrued intentions at this site. As I told Jason there will not be a third time.

Good luck to you and yours. If your candidate wins I will support him. However as with all things in life. I hope mine wins. lol

By: Tigere Wani

Tigere Wani — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:23:42 +0000

abrisaham:
"I actually was a supporter of Barak Obama until he chose to actually run for president with no experience and on a platform that was deceitful and hurtful for the Democratic party. "

Isn’t that the beauty of democracy… candidates share their opinion on issues and we the voters get to pick who we align with most. We are thankful for that. My only problem with the experience argument is that when you look at history and the people who have made presidents it really doesn’t matter who has what experience. In my own opinion, the only experience that matters is the one of having been a president before…and we all know that happens only at midterm elections with a sitting president. Being a spouse to an ex-president doesn’t qualify as experience. I too like Hilary a lot but I think fair is fair that Barack Obama seems to have what it takes to unite the nation once again. For me that is of paramount importance!

By: abrisaham

abrisaham — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:16:13 +0000

PatHmv called me a loon for not supporting Abraham Lincoln here as the great Emancipator. Yet it is Barak Obama who supports the same conclusion I have reached.

I have also been called a loon here for one of my first posts addressed the apocalypse of the bible and the people reading it did not even grasp the sense of where I was coming from with such a post. See my posting of Barak Obama’s church today.

I have been called a loon because I dont happen to believe Abraham Lincoln is the greatest president of all time.

But you know what. I don’t care. I believe what I believe and I think what I think and I support what I support. Barak Obama and his supporters are showing extremely thin skins because everytime you say something detracting about Barak Obama or his supporters they become angry, defensive and strike out.

The Mark of the far left. It is always how they react to things when they dont get their way. They have always been to this party our toddlers. Those who when told no, stomp their feet and throw temper tantrums.

I rail against the far left because I believe in a world where it honestly takes moderation to get along they are the ones in my party who refuse to get along unless it is done their way. Barak Obama is just such an example.

The once Exalted Bill Clinton is now Trash to them because he is in the way of the Throne. That is why I rail against the far left while being a lefty myself.

By: Did Bill Clinton Really Say That? No. What He Said Was Worse. : The Sundries Shack

Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:15:25 +0000

[...] the Clintons, who never met a socialist scheme they couldn’t make their own. And it involves global warming, which draws leftists like honey draws a Pooh Bear. Alas, the report doesn’t match the [...]

By: abrisaham

abrisaham — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:01:53 +0000

Oh there is no doubt I have an anti Obama Agenda. I said so on my very first post here. I thought that was obvious.

I have also supported nearly everything I have said with cut and pasted facts or at least perceived facts from somewhere on the internet most notably from reliable places such as the Washington Post, CBS news, etc.

I do not hang out in far left or far right sites. I actually was a supporter of Barak Obama until he chose to actually run for president with no experience and on a platform that was deceitful and hurtful for the Democratic party.

I have answered your question before about why I do not rail against the right. This is the Democratic Primaries. This is family business. You aint seen nothing yet. Wait till the general election when it is Us vs. Them.

Until such time It is my goal and desire to see Hillary become the Democratic nominee of the Democratic party. Somehow that has become evil to actually support Hillary Clinton. I don’t think so.

So until I am told I can’t support Hillary and oppose Barak Obama at this site then I will continue to do that which I do. Support Hillary and try to make people understand what I believe to be a candidacy of deceit by Barak Obama thru posted facts, figures and opinion from respected sources and not FAR LEFT or FAR RIGHT smear sites.

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:26:22 +0000

Ah, that explains it. I’m talking about the real big lefty blogs: Daily Kos, Open Left, MyDD, HuffPo. They’re all for Obama.

By: C Stanley

C Stanley — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:22:56 +0000

Claudia: I’m not familiar with which leftie blogs are which, but my guess is that they would line up somewhat with the main Dem coalitions: the far left being one faction and then toward the center you have DLC and Blue Dogs. The Blue Dogs, although much more centrist on policy than Obama, would probably tend to favor him because temperamentally they’re like him- they’re moderates who want to forge bipartisan compromise. DLC was practically created by Bill Clinton, so of course they’d line up behind Hillary- and although Bill talked and somewhat walked the ‘third way’ and forged compromises, he still played hardball and Hillary seems likely to be more the hardball type.

I guess what I’m saying is that the far left seems to favor Obama on policy and part of the center left seem to like him for style; meanwhile other center left people are the ones you are probably seeing that cheer Hillary’s more combative approach.

By: Claudia

Claudia — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:13:48 +0000

Michael, I’ve been at AmericaBLOG, and though the bloggers themselves are making attempts to stay relatively neutral, the commenters tilt strongly to Hillary because they see her as more capable of "taking on" the Republicans. That’s not to say they wouldn’t support him, but they don’t like his talk of compromise.