Miss America Now a Crass Boor

Filed under: Feature, Media Criticism, TV Shows — marc moore on January 28, 2008 @ 5:18 am CET

Scanning the DirectTV guide last night I decided to switch on the Miss American pageant just in time for the winnowing down to the final 10 contestants. As one who despises Survivor and other so-called “reality” shows I was unpleasantly surprised to see the six young ladies being eliminated called out and told goodbye American Idol style.

As the Baltimore Sun reports, crowd fave and Army medic Jill Stevens and her friends dropped and did a set of pushups after her name was called, an uplifting move in an otherwise dismal display of modern non-winner bashing. Granted, the pageant is trying hard to update its look and feel, but frankly the outcome was more than a little crass - a definite step back for the classic American event.

Ah memories. I vividly recall my first Miss America pageant. I was seven years old, visiting my great-aunt in Rock Island, IL, and wanted nothing more than for Rocky, her 19 year old son, to come outside and throw the baseball with me.

“Someday you’ll be old enough to want to watch these girls,” he said with a distracted smile, one eye still on the TV.

Not likely, I thought defiantly. And that proved to be more or less true. During my mid and late teens - prime babe ogling years - I was too busy with sports, friends, and real girls to watch them on the tube. In my twenties, when I might have liked looking at the beautiful young women only a few years my junior my own young, beautiful wife frowned on that sort of behavior in no uncertain terms. Now I’m old enough and round enough that she doesn’t care any longer if I watch the pageant or not. But while the contestants were as lovely as ever last night, if not more so, the format of the show is distinctly less appealing now.

Perhaps at 41 I have vaulted over the generation gap. But I really think that there’s something unsavory about this gleeful eliminating, voting off, and “firing” of contestants, especially in front of a TV audience who, in most cases, have never done anything as gutsy as getting up on stage with 49 of the most beautiful women in American to be judged on national TV.

I wasn’t sure if I wanted to write this piece at first. Times change, I thought, why fight it? You’re just getting old and grumpy. In fact, I had already switched over to and old Seinfeld rerun when I decided to flip back on the spur of the moment to give the contest another chance.

What was I greeted with? A vocal performance of Feelings or God Bless America? A young American beauty promising to use her crown to foment world peace? I wish.

Instead a young-ish, scruffy-faced dude with a hideous bit of chin stubble sat among the freshly dropped contestants with his mike open.

(I’ve since learned that this was one Clinton Kelly, star of TV’s What Not to Wear, something that explains so much).

Kelly’s scintillating question?

“How did you keep your bikini bottoms from riding up?”

Not exactly Bert Parks, is he?

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.

1 Claudia

January 28, 2008 @ 10:07 am CET

Well, I’ve got a bit of a consolation for you Marc, it’s not an age thing. I’m many years your junior and I’ve never found the Miss America pageant even slightly attractive. The way you describe it today (it’s been years since I see it) makes it sound even worse.

From my eyes the whole even is so firmly wrapped in plastic that no trace of authenticity has a prayer of slipping through. First you take perfectly lovely young women, and then you lay enough makeup on them to pave a road with. I swear the last pageant I saw they looked more like stepford wives in their thirties than 19 year old girls. Then you paste the most vacous fake smiles known to man and add the most vacous fake commentary known to man and violá, you have the pre-packaged, instantly microwavable, TV-dinner Miss America Pageant.

I’ve nothing against the contest per-se, even if I find it a bit sad that so many girls think that nothing in the world could be as important as being prettier than the other girls. However, whatever redeeming qualities the contest could have, it loses in the tacky style of the whole affair.

2 Dustin

January 28, 2008 @ 2:47 pm CET

The whole Miss America organization suffered a major culture shock when "Reality TV" hit the scene. They suddenly had to contend with the lowest common denominator and decided the only way to survive was to dive straight down into the gutter.

The state level pageants are bad enough and seem to always reward the vicious "In it to win (at all costs)" drama queens, but what they’ve done to the national level pageant has completely destroyed the veneer of respectability Miss America once had.