Jimmie’s Talking Sense

January 28th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

I agree with Jimmie: Michael Steele would be a great running mate for Mitt Romney if he wins the nomination. Steele is a solid politician, with a good, conservative background, which will probably give many conservative voters the idea that Romney is truly one of them (I’m not saying I agree with his policies).

Aside from that, it would also send a clear signal to the African-American community: conservatives aren’t racists. If you’re black, but talented, you too will be taken seriously and you too can become their party’s leader. Aside from that, it’ll be difficult for Obama (or Clinton) to play, as Jimmie explains, identity politics with a black VP.

Most importantly though, Steele is simply a good politician. John McCain too should consider picking him as his running mate if he were to win the nomination, especially considering the fact that McCain is very old, whereas Steele is young enough to take over after him (same for Romney of course).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Rudi666
    January 28th, 2008 at 20:34
    Reply | Quote | #1

    In the old days a VP was from another region or could guarantee his state to the ticket. I doubt that Maryland would go Republican, Steele couldn’t even win the Senate seat.

    In a similar vein, the St Pete Times has a story about the Crist endorsement. Seems McCain likes the sound of VP Crist and his help in delivering Florida in the general election. The Romney and Guliaini camps also courted Crist.

  2. Bob
    January 28th, 2008 at 20:51
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I think that while you still could go by region but Kerry didn’t lose by too much and Edwards wasn’t even close to winning North Carolina. Also Gore, while not VP didn’t even win his home state in 2000.

    I think that another way to go is getting a VP that has qualities the nominee is lacking and not going regions since lately the regions are pretty much set it’s now just a matter of fighting for 10-12 states. So for instance with the Democrats I think Obama should get a seasoned VP someone with lots of experience, foreign policy preferred. I think Biden isn’t a bad choice. Clinton could grab be the same but grab minority with Richardson. For the Republicans, I think McCain getting someone who knows the economy, has a record of being anti-immigration and youthful would do him well. Romney someone who is an actual social conservative would help. Steele does work for both though and I have been thinking he would be a great VP.

  3. Justin Gardner
    January 28th, 2008 at 22:07
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Steele? Really? The guy is one of the lightest of the lightweights out there. To explain…First, his resume as a leader is as a lieutenant governor for ONE term. Second, that election wasn’t exactly the hardest in the world for him because he was picked as a running mate by the gubernatorial candidate (i.e. a VP position) and faced a very easy contest due to the outgoing Dem governor’s personal peccadillos. Third, when he ran for the Senate on his own he proved he couldn’t win it. Last, he’s presently just a fundraiser and a pundit, which is what he was before his only term as an elected official. But just to be clear…THIS is the guy you want to be a heartbeat away from the top spot? And you have a problem with Obama’s experience?Also, let’s look at the national scene. If Romney gets the nod, he’ll need somebody to shore up his foreign policy resume. Steele ain’t it. If McCain gets the nods, he’ll need somebody to shore up his economic policy resume. Steele still ain’t it.Michael, you’re batting 0 for 2 today. ;-)

  4. Justin Gardner
    January 28th, 2008 at 22:12
    Reply | Quote | #4

    My apologies, but that comment was supposed to be broken up into four paragraphs.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500