Nuclear energy produces electricity. Oil powers cars. Luring Middle East countries to switch to nuclear does NOTHING to their oil use. It can reduce their use of natural gas — which is often used for producing electricity and for desalination of water. However, the screwy notion that switching to nuclear energy lessens oil dependency is ENTIRELY faulty, although frequently used, recently by King Abdullah II of Jordan and others. It’s akin to saying, "I have a hole in my shoe, so I will buy a new hat."
Building nuclear reactors will only give terrorists new site to attack — and may indeed lead to the rise of dirty bombs from radioactive waste, which is known to go "missing" even in the US. Nuclear is being pushed as a new source for energy-sucking desalination — and will kick billions into Western economies. However, solar energy can be used as well — as they are demonstrating in Australia. The pumping up of nuclear is a misguided sales pitch from France and the US that should be ignored. There is still no solution to deal with high-level radioactive waste — the United States previous attempt to recycle it was a costly blunder. Now there is talk of GNEP — the global nuclear energy partnership — which would involve Russia in the role of collecting nuclear waste. This is alarming — and the last time we looked Russia mafia we’re all over the energy sector.
]]>
Rather "Ce n’est pas un problème". 
English: c’est n’est pas un problem.
]]>With the generation 4 to nuclear reactor, France have a good futur.
(Sorry for my english) ]]>