Dan Riehl Is Right

January 20th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

I think that Dan Riehl is right: match-up polls are nothing but an exercise in name-recognition right now, which is why John McCain is doing well in them. But, when push comes to shove, he’s quite simply too old, not inspiring enough, and he won’t be able to get the conservative base moving. No, if I were a Republican I would be hoping for a Romney/Thompson ticket.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. kreiz
    January 20th, 2008 at 14:26
    Reply | Quote | #1

    McCain has blemishes, to be sure.  I agree with Riehl to this extent- name recognition and "time in grade" are huge assets.   However, if nominated, McCain will be the first major party candidate in my memory who isn’t a regimented ideologically thinker.  As far back as I can remember, party nominees fall (or would fall) near a perfect 0 or 100 on the American Conservative Union ratings scale.  Dole was around a 96.  Kerry has an ACU score of 2.5 lifetime!  Hillary Clinton is at 9; Barack is a lifetime 2.  In contrast, McCain rates a relatively moderate 82 lifetime (18 points below a "perfect" conservative 100), and he’s had years where his rating was in the 70s. 

    Relatively speaking, he is a maverick, a free thinker.  That  bodes well for the country- which is not as ideological as either party.

  2. kreiz
    January 20th, 2008 at 14:35
    Reply | Quote | #2

    In 2004, McCain’s ACU rating was 72.

  3. Tap
    January 21st, 2008 at 00:37
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Oh come now. George Bush wasn’t a member of congress so I don’t think the ACU would’ve rated him. But my point is this: Neither he nor his father were  ever exactly on the far right.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500