Comments on: Lancet Botches Another One

By: Tap

Tap — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:31:52 +0000

Why is Critter wrong on this one?

His post was almost entirely quoted from ‘Medecins Sans Frontieres’. At the end, Critter acknowledges that he knows ‘zip’ about this and is without personal opinion on it.

I think you are using misinformation to back up your opinion that the 2006 study was attacked unjustly.

By: Rudi666

Rudi666 — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:34:34 +0000

I think the Critter is barking at the "moonbats". There was no Lancet study to attack on methodology in this case. Conflating the "Lancet study/survey" with a series of papers at a conference has nothing to do with study methods. Critter is wrong on this one and is using exaggerations to attack the 2006 study.