Filed under: Foreign Affairs, Media Criticism — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on January 17, 2008 @ 5:31 pm CET
Earlier today, Jason linked to an article at Salon, in which Stephen M. Walt writes that American newspapers should hire some foreign policy realists; they’ve got neoconservative columnists, and liberal columnists, but no realists.
Although I agree with that I think there’s one problem: realists are boring. The liberals and neocons talk about lofty ideals, realists take reality as it is and basically tell everyone “that’s not gonna happen. That’s not gonna work.” Of course, more often than not they’re right, but since they’re realists their writing is realistic as well, which equals “boring” for the average reader who doesn’t take a great interest in the nuances of foreign policy.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments
policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or
willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email.