Michigan Primary

January 16th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

Tonight Mitt Romney kept his presidential aspirations alive by, it’s projected, winning the Michigan Republican primary.

romney-wins-mich.jpg

With 50% of precincts reporting, Mr. Romney, who was just yesterday shown to be in a very close race with John McCain, is leading with 39% of the vote, 10% more than Mr. McCain. Mike Huckabee trails with 16%.

This will certainly make an already interesting race even tighter and place even more emphasis on next month’s Super Tuesday extravaganza when 24 states will cast their 2008 primary votes.

Romney, the son of former Michigan Governor George Romney, was making what might have been his last stand in his former home state and it showed up in the money count. CNN reports that Romney spent more than $3 million on TV ads in the state in defeating his two main rivals.

Once again the pollsters and pundits were shown to be less than omniscient. Newsweek wondered only a few days ago if Huckabee would defeat Romney there. Egg on face, again.

Romney, with his personal fortune backing him, has come back from the dead, at least in part. I would be surprised to see him in the lead after Super Tuesday - too many Republicans dislike him on sight. calling his polished image manufactured and his shifting positions too dependent on poll numbers. I concur.

Fred Thompson, unfortunately, is a study in the de-evolution of a candidate. Despite strong performances in recent debates and what I would consider to be a deeper understanding of economic policy than the other candidates have shown, Thompson managed a mere 4% of the vote in Michigan, less than Ron Paul, a candidate with his own image troubles.

A recent Rasmussen poll shows Huckabee leading McCain in South Carolina with Romney lagging in 3rd place, evidence that this race is a long way from being over.

Meanwhile, Barack Obama’s absence from the ballot made Michigan a non-story On the Democratic side. I suppose that we’ll have to wait and see what’s next in this aggressively contested race.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Nick
    January 16th, 2008 at 04:11
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Thompson showing a depth of understanding on economic issue that other don’t? Pass the crack pipe, then do a simple wiki search on Dr.Paul and notice his study of economics, including 10 published books on the matter and a Von Mises fellowship.

    When your done consider revising you article,blog, whatever it is.

  2. Tracy G.
    January 16th, 2008 at 04:15
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I have to agree with Nick.

  3. kreiz
    January 16th, 2008 at 04:51
    Reply | Quote | #3

    So far, none of the GOP caucus/primary winners have been able to generate much momentum out of their wins.  After IA and NH, Huckabee and McCain polling spiked in all polls, with a resulting drop after the next contest.  It’s as if frontrunner scrutiny creates Midas-in-Reverse.  Wild.  SC was polling well for Huck after IA, and McCain after NH.  What’s going to happen now?  We’re all clueless.  One of my few predictions that may come true is that SC will be relatively evenly divided among 4 contenders.  FL is looking the same.  Holy cow, it’s a wild run.  One thing’s  certain- everybody’s running low on cash except Mitt.

  4. Rudi666
    January 16th, 2008 at 17:15
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I’ll have to admit this was a big/good win for Mitter. Most polls said the race was tight, the results beg to differ. McCain’s performance is a setback for his campaign. Once again the polls were off the mark.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500