Comments on: Huckabee Shows His True Colors

By: C Stanley

C Stanley — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:01:22 +0000

Of course my view could be skewed, but you don’t seem to see that yours is also greatly skewed in the other direction because you live in secular Europe and you only view the American political system through the lens of bloggers and pundits.

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:50:59 +0000

but it doesn’t match up with what I see in everyday experience of how Americans overall view religion in politics.

Could that be because you live in a red state and probably deal mostly with people who think like you?

I think he’ll be a great hit, especially in the North East.

Heh.

No I think we disagree on this and I think that only time will tell who’s right. But I’m feeling pretty confident.

By: C Stanley

C Stanley — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:43:38 +0000

I agree with you about the bumps in the polls after a primary/caucus win, so I’m not trying to make too much of those matchups. Still though, I don’t see how you can support your assertion that Huckabee’s Christian message is so toxic. It seems to be based on your own feelings as well as those of politically minded people who blog- but it doesn’t match up with what I see in everyday experience of how Americans overall view religion in politics.

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:36:32 +0000

With regards to who the best chance has of winning the nomination, Rasmussen Markets says McCain, followed by Giuliani and Romney.

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:35:23 +0000

Actually: that’ll change asap. And I see I have to take my words back:

Those surveys find Mike Huckabee leading Clinton 45% to 42% while Obama leads Huckabee 45% to 43%.

Now that Romney has won, you’ll see his numbers go up. Just like Huckabee’s went up. What I think will happen is that it’ll be very close indeed come November.

McCAin, by the way, is kicking Clinton’s butt:

The survey, conducted on the two nights following New Hampshire’s Primary, shows McCain attracting 49% of the vote nationwide while Clinton earns 38%.

Keep in mind when it was conducted though: shortly after McCain’s victory and Huckabee’s victory in Iowa.

One thing: I’m convinced - yes convinced - that if Huckabee becomes the nominee, Clitnon or Obama will wipe the floor with him. His "change the constitution according to God’s standards" will be disastrous.

By: C Stanley

C Stanley — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:29:30 +0000

1. He’s slipping.

Yes, but I don’t see the evidence that he’s slipping because of his Christian message. I think it could well be that he needs to move away from that to show that this isn’t all he’s about, but I really can’t see that he’s getting the kind of backlash you’re expecting. A certain number of people have opposed him because of the religious emphasis all along, but it seems to be a steady number that feels that way, not a growing one.

2. We’re talking about Republican voters.

No, I’m talking about national polling of all likely voters.

3. He’s doing very badly in match-ups.

Actually McCain is the only one who’s doing well in matchups, and Romney is among the worst against both Hillary and Obama.

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:20:51 +0000

How else do you explain Huckabee’s popularity in the national polls

1. He’s slipping.
2. We’re talking about Republican voters
3. He’s doing very badly in match-ups

In other words, looking at national polls actually confirms what I’m saying.

And if he doesn’t win in South Carolina, I think that we can finally safely say that he, at least, is out. If Thompson doesn’t do well, he’s got the same issue, so that would mean that both Thompson and Huckasaint are out.

By: C Stanley

C Stanley — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:10:19 +0000

Well, again, I think that people who rely on the blogosphere for a read on how the US voters in general feel about a Christian message by a politician will have a skewed view of how voters actually react to that. How else do you explain Huckabee’s popularity in the national polls (though I know he’s slipping- but if people were willing to say they’d support him, it’s not as though they didn’t already know that he’s a Baptist preacher who uses a strong Christian values message in his campaign.)

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:04:13 +0000

One problem: Huckabee on the ticket will cause the Presidential candidate a terrific problem with the rest of the population imo.

For GOP I think this is a good set-up: Romney / Thompson (or the other way around).

By: C Stanley

C Stanley — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:02:59 +0000

Fill in the blank and Huckabee in 08 anyone?

Yes, that’s what I’ve been thinking (and somewhat hoping) for a while now. As you pointed out, he complements almost all of the other top tier candidates by bringing home the evangelical base- but there are other ways too that he rounds out all of the potential tickets. He brings charm, affability, Southern-ness, communication skills, moderation, and a lite economic populism. All of these are lacking in the other candidates to one degree or another, and I think all are going to be important for electability (particularly the economic popolism which at least acknowledges that people are hurting in an economic downturn. Like it or not, lots of voters want to know that their presidential candidates ‘feel their pain’.)