Human Events Endorses Fred Thompson

January 11th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Human Events, the conservative organization, has endorsed Senator Fred Thompson for the Republican nomination and the presidency.

The greatly respected organization explains:

Since World War II, America has not had a presidential election at a time when the stakes were higher. Conservatives have to win this election, and to do so, we have to identify a candidate around whom we all can rally.

We begin by recalling the profound words of Ronald Reagan at the Conservative Political Action Conference Feb. 15, 1975: “A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency or simply to swell its numbers.” We believed that then, and we believe it now. The issue for us — and for the conservative community — boils down to which of the candidates is most representative of the fundamental conservative principles we believe in. The answer is Fred Thompson.

About Senator John McCain Human Events had the following to say: ‘Sen. John McCain of Arizona is a war hero whose personal courage sustained many of the men imprisoned with him in the infamous “Hanoi Hilton.” We honor him, but he does not honor many conservative principles. His co-authorship of the Bush-McCain-Kennedy “comprehensive immigration reform” legislation last summer ran directly against our principles of American sovereignty and national security.’

They are also not happy with his ‘opposition to the Bush tax cuts, his support for economy-strangling measures to control “global warming” and his anti-torture legislation.’

And Governor Mike Huckabee? ‘Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee is a charming and agreeable gentleman. But his support for the economically disastrous “cap-and-trade” fix for global warming is as bad as Sen. McCain’s position on the issue. The so-called “fair tax” he supports is unworkable. His tax-and-spend policies do not comport with conservative principles, but they do align all too well with Huckabee’s populist rhetoric on the injustice of corporate CEO salaries.’

Aside from that ‘[h]is stance on granting special benefits to the children of illegal aliens is also very troubling. On the war, Gov. Huckabee’s understanding of the issues does not impress us.’

What may come as a surprise to some critics of Governor Mitt Romney, Human Events is actually quite positive about him: ‘Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is a closer call. We believe his relatively new pro-life position is a sincere one, but examining his record and listening to his campaign rhetoric indicate to us that he is more a problem-solver than a gut conservative.’

They cite “Romney-care” and ‘the big-government approach he took as governor, raising state “fees,” according to the Cato Institute, by $500 million and proposing two corporate tax increases totaling close to $400 million a year’ as examples of this problem-solving attitude.

The conclusion for Human Events, then? Senator Fred Thompson is the most solid conservative candidate running.

Human Events is greatly respected among conservatives. I don’t quite see how this endorsement cannot have an impact. He needs all the endorsements he can get in the run-up to the primary of South Carolina, but this isn’t just an endorsement, it’s quite a bit and important one.

Is it in time? Who knows. He should do fairly well in South Carolina and he’s campaigning hard there. He also did very well yesterday: he was the winner of the debate according to most who watched it live. Increasingly more conservatives are waking up to the reality that although there aren’t a lot of solid conservatives running, there are at least a few and Thompson is most definitely one of them.

As an aside, I consider Human Events’ description of Romney to be fairly accurate (problem-solver not dogmatic conservative) but to me that’s not a con but a pro. Then again, that’s probably because I’m not a conservative for Americans, but more right-of-center, or even centrist (dependent on where one puts the center; there seems to be great debate about that in the US these days).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500