Britain Goes Nuclear

Filed under: Britain, Energy, Europe, France, Nuclear Energy, The Netherlands, United States — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on January 10, 2008 @ 5:00 pm CET

Ed Morrissey reports, linking to this article at Yahoo news, that Britain ” has endorsed nuclear power as a solution to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions. They will encourage new facility construction with an eye to having the next generation of stations on line by 2020.”

As Ed points out, this isn’t exactly the solution the environmental lobby was looking for, but the fact of the matter is that nuclear energy is quite safe and that we don’t have to worry too much about the effect it will have on the environment: in fact, it will probably be good for the environment.

John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace couldn’t care less, however, and said: “We need energy efficiency, cleaner use of fossil fuels, renewables and state of the art decentralized power stations like those in Scandinavia. That’s the way to defeat climate change and ensure energy security.”

As Ed rightfully points out, “[t]he problem with the Greenpeace approach is that it won’t generate the energy levels we already have now, let alone what we’ll need in 2020 and beyond.”

Without nuclear power the West has a problem. With nuclear power, however, we don’t. The solution to the energy problem really is simple: we’ve got to use to nuclear power. Now, those who oppose it will try to make citizens afraid of nuclear power (plants) by using the horrible events of Chernobyl as an example of what’ll happen if Western countries, in this case Britain, go nuclear, but the reality is that much has been improved over time and that there’s virtually no chance that we’ll see a Chernobyl II.

In the Netherlands we use the nuclear energy France produces: that way our politicians can pretend that they keep their hands clean. The reality is, however, that they don’t and that they shouldn’t. Nuclear energy isn’t just a perfect solution for Britain, but it’s also a great solution for the United States and the Netherlands.

France is nuclear, Britain goes nuclear, the rest of the West should follow suit. Quickly.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

1 Comment »

  1. 1 Interested

    January 10, 2008 @ 5:41 pm CET

    As Ed rightfully points out, “[t]he problem with the Greenpeace approach is that it won’t generate the energy levels we already have now, let alone what we’ll need in 2020 and beyond.”

    Greenpeace won’t be happy until there is 5,000 citizens on the world running around with clubs. And you are correct, we should concentrate on Nuke Energy, make it safer, more efficient and more available.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Steve: No more First Amendment? — that is why Americans have a Second Amendment. Thugs may try to stiffle my...
  • Jay_C: I am forced to agree with this: " But compared to the cost of a depression, it’s still a steal at...
  • Jay_C: Question about this…The bailout failed the first time it was brought to the House.  Since the...
  • David: Welcome to socialism being shoved down the throat of a free market capitalistic economy. No one seems to be...
  • Eric Dondero: If you vote for Sarah Palin YOU ARE VOTING 3RD PARTY.  She’s a libertarian Republican. ...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here