McCain and Clinton Lead in New Hampshire

January 5th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The very latest Reuters/C–SPAN/Zogby poll - partially taken after the Iowa caucuses - shows that, although Barack Obama has picked up a couple of points in New Hampshire, he’s still well behind Hillary Clinton and that, although John McCain is still leading Mitt Romney, the latter has closed the gap a bit.

32% of likely Republican caucus goers say they intend to vote for the Senator from Arizona. He’s closely followed by Romney with 30%. This means, indeed, that the gap has become smaller in recent days. Before yesterday, the gap was, lest we forget, 4%. If Romney continues this trend, he’ll have the gap closed by Monday. This means that, although I wrote earlier today that McCain is the favorite in the Granite State, the race there is still wide open and that Romney could very well make a strong comeback there. Don’t forget, if Romney wins, he’s back.

One of the most interesting aspects about the latest results is that McCain is only in the lead because he’s firmly supported by Independents. Romney is doing better among conservatives. “Romney’s edge over McCain among mainline conservatives – the largest voting bloc in the GOP - increased from one to five points.”

Huckabee, meanwhile, is in third position with 10%. That’s not much, indeed, but it’s what he needs and wants to do. He doesn’t have to do much better than that. My guess is that his numbers will improve in the next couple of days. He’s already improving his numbers among those who consider themselves to be “very conservative”: support for him among this group increased from 21% to 28%.

Frankly I find it a bit awkward that Romney’s numbers have gone up after losing in Iowa. It gives one the impression that his ads are either working in NH or that New Hampshire Republicans saw what happened in Iowa and decided that they’d rather have Romney representing them than Huckabee.

Or both.

Clinton’s, meanwhile, still in the lead but her lead too has decreased with 2%. She’s now leading Obama by 4%. Will this trend continue or will Clinton hold on to her lead? It’s getting closer among Democrats as well, but I think it’s safe to say that Clinton’s still the (slight) favorite. And if she wins, she’s back completely. If Obama loses, Hillary’s in trouble, but it’s far from over.

Luckily we can quite easily see whether this is a trend or not, because Zogby will publish a poll every day, until Tuesday.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. roger
    January 5th, 2008 at 20:41
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Come on people in New Hampshire, you don’ want to be like the good people in Iowa, losers. Is’t strange that the Clintons loved the people in Iowa last week, and after the election that she lost, they are now hicks.  It’s ok, the Clintons can do  and say what they what, because  they are the Clintons. Just ask Mr Foster and Mr Parks, O I am sorry the Clintons had them gunned down. So people in New Hampshire be careful how you vote, or the Clinton machine may come after you.  I am proud of the people in Iowa, for taking a stand on  Hillary.

  2. Reason
    January 7th, 2008 at 22:39
    Reply | Quote | #2

    …and these Clinton poll leading figures are from your @$$?

  3. Tully
    January 7th, 2008 at 23:15
    Reply | Quote | #3

    We knew it wouldn’t be long before CDS returned, what with BDS becoming irrelevant.

    Romney’s NH numbers went up because independents can vote in either (but not both) primaries there, and Obama is expected to suck up a lot of the Indie vote that McCain was counting on.  It’s not so much that Romney went up as that McCain lost a bit.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500