Comments on: Joe Carter on Campaigns

By: AMERICAN NONSENSE » It Is Caucus Day in Iowa: ROUNDUP of News and Rumor with All Day Updates and Polls

Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:28:28 +0000

[...] van der Galien from the PoliGazette, has another interesting tidbit about Mitt Romney and a possible nasty little surprise and here is [...]

By: It Is Caucus Day in Iowa: ROUNDUP of News and Rumor with All Day Updates and Polls | AMERICAN NONSENSE

Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:09:33 +0000

[...] van der Galien from the PoliGazette, has another interesting tidbit about Mitt Romney and a possible nasty little surprise and here is [...]

By: JenJen

JenJen — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:46:11 +0000

Aaaah, hadn’t read the update. Just seems to me that the timing is the thing putting the book presser and Joe Carter’s claims together, though.

Then again, Rollins talked smack all day today and Carter’s likely doing the same. It’s really quite pathetic.

By: JenJen

JenJen — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:34:52 +0000

anyway less than sign then blockquote then greater than sign (your first attempt) works if your in HTML mode.

Thank you, Interested!!

By: JenJen

JenJen — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:27:54 +0000

What’s this, then? It sounds to me like this book could be about a Democratic presidential candidate, but since it’s coming out on Monday (Jan 7th) and Joe Carter says we’d hear about the scandal by Tuesday (Jan 8th)… well, could these two things be related?

Revelation (Charge) To Be Made Against New Hampshire Primary Candidate Monday?

By: Interested

Interested — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:26:44 +0000

lol ok it didn’t like that

anyway less than sign then blockquote then greater than sign (your first attempt) works if your in HTML mode.

By: Interested

Interested — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:25:42 +0000

Two ways
the

without spaces if you click HTML and edit manually
Or the one with the blue arrow to the right - (does not work for me too much

But, Clinton was indeed impeached. I mean, every attempt was certainly made to make sure his conduct was a disqualifying factor, wasn’t it?

Tried sure, but he had the affair during his 92 run (Jennifer Flowers) We elected him - stating it was not a disqualifying factor. He then went on with Lewinsky - and the public also figured the GOP went too far in trying to impeach him and said in-office is not disqualifying either.

And those are the two we know about with him.

By: JenJen

JenJen — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:19:23 +0000

Blockquote tips, anyone?

By: JenJen

JenJen — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:17:53 +0000

[blockquote]For Edwards it would be the utter kiss of death, few people would vote for a man who cheats on his wife when she’s sick with cancer.[/blockquote]

Unless they’re in Newt Gingrich’s district.

But, Clinton was indeed impeached. I mean, every attempt was certainly made to make sure his conduct was a disqualifying factor, wasn’t it?

By: Interested

Interested — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:32:50 +0000

For a sitting president, no. But these are candidates, many of whom are close in the polls, any scandal could ruin their chances.

With Clinton it was sitting & during his first run for the Presidency. Lewinsky was just more of the same for him.

By the way, almost the totality of speculation is that the smear will be directed at a Republican. Any particular reason for this?

probably because people have become used to the fact that it’s been different rules for different parties.