<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fred Thompson to Drop Out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poligazette.com/2008/01/03/fred-thompson-to-drop-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/01/03/fred-thompson-to-drop-out/</link>
	<description>News and Analysis from Different Moderate Perspectives</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Winghunter</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/01/03/fred-thompson-to-drop-out/#comment-14658</link>
		<dc:creator>Winghunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/01/03/fred-thompson-to-drop-out/#comment-14658</guid>
		<description>More Lies From The MSM To Push Their Agenda.

AP Gives Thompson the ‘04 Treatment by Jed Babbin
&lt;a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24127" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24127&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Lies From The MSM To Push Their Agenda.</p>
<p>AP Gives Thompson the ‘04 Treatment by Jed Babbin<br />
<a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24127" rel="nofollow">http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24127</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/01/03/fred-thompson-to-drop-out/#comment-14647</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/01/03/fred-thompson-to-drop-out/#comment-14647</guid>
		<description>I frankly think that's a crock. 

Iowa does not matter &lt;em&gt;nearly&lt;/em&gt; as much as some would have us believe. The major benefit of finishing well in Iowa is the infusion of campaign donations that results. There's no real reason for Thompson to drop unless he fails to show strongly in later races, unless he chooses to throw an endorsement to another candidate and angle for a VP slot or some convention chips. Iowa just isn't that important, and Thompson's support is strongest in the south.  He's unlikely to drop out before Super Tuesday unless he shows REALLY poorly in South Carolina, and then it would be to angle to support someone else's campaign.

Let's take the 2000 elections as an example of Iowa as a predicter. Bush won the Iowa caucus with 41%, and the runners-up order was Forbes 30%, Keyes 14%, Bauer 8%, and McCain 4%. So, quick, without peeking, Bush swept New Hampshire, right? After all, McCain barely registered in Iowa....

Heh. WRONG. McCain took New Hampshire (a primary &lt;a href="http://stubbornfacts.us/politics/the_iowa_tilt" rel="nofollow"&gt;much more representative&lt;/a&gt; of mainstream trends) by 49% to Bush's 31%, with the rest of the field picking up the crumbs, and only Forbes breaking double digits (13%). Not until Bush won South Carolina did McCain start to fade.

How about 1992 instead? Heh, again. Harkin swept Iowa, and Paul Tsongas took New Hampshire, becoming the presumptive frontrunner. Clinton didn't become a truly serious contender until he took Illinois (with a lot of help from the Rodham family connections). 

Bottom line: Iowa is fun to watch, but doesn't mean all that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frankly think that&#8217;s a crock. </p>
<p>Iowa does not matter <em>nearly</em> as much as some would have us believe. The major benefit of finishing well in Iowa is the infusion of campaign donations that results. There&#8217;s no real reason for Thompson to drop unless he fails to show strongly in later races, unless he chooses to throw an endorsement to another candidate and angle for a VP slot or some convention chips. Iowa just isn&#8217;t that important, and Thompson&#8217;s support is strongest in the south.  He&#8217;s unlikely to drop out before Super Tuesday unless he shows REALLY poorly in South Carolina, and then it would be to angle to support someone else&#8217;s campaign.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take the 2000 elections as an example of Iowa as a predicter. Bush won the Iowa caucus with 41%, and the runners-up order was Forbes 30%, Keyes 14%, Bauer 8%, and McCain 4%. So, quick, without peeking, Bush swept New Hampshire, right? After all, McCain barely registered in Iowa&#8230;.</p>
<p>Heh. WRONG. McCain took New Hampshire (a primary <a href="http://stubbornfacts.us/politics/the_iowa_tilt" rel="nofollow">much more representative</a> of mainstream trends) by 49% to Bush&#8217;s 31%, with the rest of the field picking up the crumbs, and only Forbes breaking double digits (13%). Not until Bush won South Carolina did McCain start to fade.</p>
<p>How about 1992 instead? Heh, again. Harkin swept Iowa, and Paul Tsongas took New Hampshire, becoming the presumptive frontrunner. Clinton didn&#8217;t become a truly serious contender until he took Illinois (with a lot of help from the Rodham family connections). </p>
<p>Bottom line: Iowa is fun to watch, but doesn&#8217;t mean all that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhugg</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/01/03/fred-thompson-to-drop-out/#comment-14638</link>
		<dc:creator>jhugg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/01/03/fred-thompson-to-drop-out/#comment-14638</guid>
		<description>My conservative friends, this is another attempt by the mainstream media (i.e. the &lt;em&gt;Politico&lt;/em&gt;) to try to draw support away from Fred the day of the Iowa caucus. My personal hope is that he does not drop but fights to the bitter end. I think Iowa will be a springboard for his campaign. A true conservative, as Fred is, will never garner much support in states like Iowa or New Hampshire. South Carolina has proven in years past that it is less and less a conservative state. Thompson's main support will come on &#34;Super Tuesday.&#34; Let me address one other issue! For years and years, conservatives have prayed for a &#34;true&#34; conservative. A true conservative is a conservative on all the issues, not just a few of the issues (i.e. all the other Republican candidates). For the first time since the late '80s, we have one, Fred Thompson. As expected, the mainstream media and liberal Democratic machine has attacked him with their usual vehemence. Yet, the same conservative voters who have bemoaned the lack of a suitable conservative candidate have bought into the &#34;he's lazy&#34;, &#34;he's not eloquent&#34;, and &#34;he doesn't want to be president&#34; garbage that the two groups above have been feeding to the American people. Likewise, conservative radio talk show hosts (i.e. Rush, Mark Levin, etc.) have not come out strongly to support him. I understand they have to be careful about who they publicly endorse. However, we've been waiting for a true conservative and we finally have one. We may not get another such candidate for another 20 years. I can understand these conservatives not wanting to openly endorse candidates with conservatives viewpoints (i.e. George W. Bush, Romney, Huckabee, etc.) who are not true conservatives. But, this election is different. All the crying and whining for a true conservative is over. All the prayers for a man who will not succumb to the modern definition of conservatism have been answered in Fred Thompson! My question is, why are my conservative friends not supporting him openly and loudly? This is our chance to back a candidate that is what we have all been waiting for. Stand up, be heard, and combat the erroneous concept of Thompson that is being portrayed to our nation. Because in the end, there is only one candidate who is running for president for the single reason of serving the American people and his name is Fred Thompson!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My conservative friends, this is another attempt by the mainstream media (i.e. the <em>Politico</em>) to try to draw support away from Fred the day of the Iowa caucus. My personal hope is that he does not drop but fights to the bitter end. I think Iowa will be a springboard for his campaign. A true conservative, as Fred is, will never garner much support in states like Iowa or New Hampshire. South Carolina has proven in years past that it is less and less a conservative state. Thompson&#8217;s main support will come on &quot;Super Tuesday.&quot; Let me address one other issue! For years and years, conservatives have prayed for a &quot;true&quot; conservative. A true conservative is a conservative on all the issues, not just a few of the issues (i.e. all the other Republican candidates). For the first time since the late &#8217;80s, we have one, Fred Thompson. As expected, the mainstream media and liberal Democratic machine has attacked him with their usual vehemence. Yet, the same conservative voters who have bemoaned the lack of a suitable conservative candidate have bought into the &quot;he&#8217;s lazy&quot;, &quot;he&#8217;s not eloquent&quot;, and &quot;he doesn&#8217;t want to be president&quot; garbage that the two groups above have been feeding to the American people. Likewise, conservative radio talk show hosts (i.e. Rush, Mark Levin, etc.) have not come out strongly to support him. I understand they have to be careful about who they publicly endorse. However, we&#8217;ve been waiting for a true conservative and we finally have one. We may not get another such candidate for another 20 years. I can understand these conservatives not wanting to openly endorse candidates with conservatives viewpoints (i.e. George W. Bush, Romney, Huckabee, etc.) who are not true conservatives. But, this election is different. All the crying and whining for a true conservative is over. All the prayers for a man who will not succumb to the modern definition of conservatism have been answered in Fred Thompson! My question is, why are my conservative friends not supporting him openly and loudly? This is our chance to back a candidate that is what we have all been waiting for. Stand up, be heard, and combat the erroneous concept of Thompson that is being portrayed to our nation. Because in the end, there is only one candidate who is running for president for the single reason of serving the American people and his name is Fred Thompson!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  is_writable() [<a href='function.is-writable'>function.is-writable</a>]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in <b>/home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php</b> on line <b>500</b><br />
