Huckabee Won’t Go Negative… Well, Won’t He?

Filed under: 2008 elections — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on December 31, 2007 @ 9:46 pm CET

OK, this is extremely awkward: Governor Mike Huckabee held a press conference today in which he would, among other things, show a new ad that would air all throughout Iowa. In the ad, he attacks Romney: not a bit, but very aggressively.

Reporters ran to the conference, looking forward to seeing the ad. However, when they arrived Huckabee said that he had changed his mind and that he had decided not to air the ad in Iowa. He did, however, show the ad to reporters who then happily reported it, which means that it’ll be broadcasted, for free, nonetheless.

Huckabee explained that he didn’t want to go negative. But, because he showed the ad to reporters anyway, they all started laughing, clearly believing that he’s playing politics (and that in a very cynical manner).

The question is, of course, whether it’ll work. Hot Air’s Allahpundit (who has declared war on Huckabee) doesn’t think so. “It’s his entire cynical faux nice guy style of politics in microcosm — the man who’s so innocent and virtuous that he doesn’t even recognize the Machiavellian gambits he somehow keeps stumbling into,” he writes. Adding that “[i]f there’s any justice the media will tear him to pieces for this, if only for treating them like they’re stupid.”

The text of the ad can be read at First Read:

It starts off with Huckabee speaking to the viewer: “I’m Mike Huckabee, and I approve this message, because Iowans have a right to know the truth about Mitt Romney’s dishonest attacks on me and even an American hero, John McCain.”

Next an announcer takes over saying: “Romney’s record? Over $700 million in new taxes. Left office with a deficit. No executions. Supported gun control. And Romney’s government mandated health plan provided a $50 co-pay for abortion.”

Then Huckabee himself delivers the final blow: “If a man is dishonest to obtain a job, he’ll be on the job. Iowans deserve better.”

When reporters asked him why he showed them the ad nonetheless Huckabee gave the lame answer: “If I didn’t show it, you’d say I never had [the ad].” They then asked him whether he thought this would help or hurt him. Huckabee’s answer: “If it hurts me, it hurts me… I’m taking a risk here. I know I am. If it completely makes it so he pulls away in a dramatic way, then I’ll probably be the last guy to ever do this. But I’d like to be the first one to ever try. Thursday night, I will let you know if it was smart.”

Frankly, I’ve got no idea what to think about this move. It comes across as utterly silly and cynical to me. If he didn’t want it to be aired, he wouldn’t have shown it to reporters. If he believes that going negative equals him selling his soul, he wouldn’t even have mentioned the ad, at least not in this manner.

Instead of being moral he acts like someone who donates thousands of dollars to charity and who, instead of doing it knowing that he’s doing the right thing and leave it at that, goes on to tell everyone how generous he is and how much money he exactly gave to those charities.

Will it work? Not sure. If the media blast him, it’ll probably blow up in his face. If they, however, herald him as a genius it’ll probably help.

UPDATE

The New York Times isn’t willing to play along:

In an act of political jujitsu, Mike Huckabee has halted a negative ad that he was about to broadcast on television Monday against his Republican rival, Mitt Romney. But while claiming the moral high ground, he proceeded to show the ad to a roomful of reporters, photographers and television cameras who are repeating his anti-Romney message for free while Mr. Huckabee declares that his hands are clean.

Via the Washington Post comes this video:

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

11 Comments »

  1. 1 Larry

    December 31, 2007 @ 9:57 pm CET

    McCain and Huckabee are the desperate ones…they don’t want anyone to know or ask about their records! Romney has been having "Ask Mitt Anything" meetings for over a year he’s not afraid to discuss his past or his positions. Has Huckabee or McCain been so open?….NO, in fact they won’t even address what Romney has brought to light! They’re just side-kicks for one another and their only rebuttal to Romney is "Liar".Romney is by far the best candidate, he will provide the kind of leadership, knowledge, and rational needed to erase our trade deficit, ween our foreign dependency of oil, and strengthen the family (his family looks pretty exemplerary to me).

    Huckabee is having a political meltdown….say good bye.

  2. 2 Van

    December 31, 2007 @ 10:29 pm CET

    wouldn’t happen to be any of these "ask Romney anything" sessions on youtube would there?

  3. 3 Will Argyle

    December 31, 2007 @ 10:31 pm CET

    What a sneaky, clueless move.Huckabee just broke the first rule of politics: If you’re gonna be an ass, don’t get caught wearing the ears.Do I hear an egg timer?

  4. 4 Blogs of War

    December 31, 2007 @ 11:50 pm CET

    Mike Huckabee Melodrama: Pulls Negative Ad - Then Runs it for the Media…

    A bizarre bit of political theater from the Huckabee campaign:
    Talk about political jujitsu!
    Mike Huckabee is holding a press conference right now in which he was supposed to unveil a new negative ad against arch rival Mitt Romney.
    But Mr. Huckabee …

  5. 5 Tyler

    January 1, 2008 @ 1:00 am CET

    Ok everybody, I was gonna go against all my previous promises and go negative on Romney anyway, and I even filmed a new ad and called everyone to this press conference, but alas, God told me not to show you THIS AD THAT YOU WILL SEE ON THE BIG SCREEN RIGHT NOW! PRESS PLAY! REPORTERS, GOT YOUR CAMERAS READY??

  6. 6 Michael van der Galien

    January 1, 2008 @ 1:12 am CET

    Tyler: one gets the impression that the media aren’t quite willing to let Huckabee get away with this trick.

    One truly wonders who the heck decided to pull this stunt.

  7. 7 Tyler

    January 1, 2008 @ 1:19 am CET

    I’ve gotten so tired of Huck silently pandering to religious bigots who will vote for him only because he’s not Mormon.  Oh brother.  I hope that something this ridiculous will finally sway everyone - bigots and nonbigots alike - away from this clown of a politician.

  8. 8 Jeff

    January 1, 2008 @ 4:43 pm CET

    Van, there are dozens of "Ask Mitt Anything" videos on youtube — just go to youtube and search.

    It’s pretty impressive that Mitt will open up and address such a wide range of questions on the record.

  9. 9 politicalpartypoop.com » Blog Archive » Suckabee the slickster

    January 2, 2008 @ 6:46 pm CET

    […] PoliGazette » Huckabee Won’t Go Negative… Well, Won’t He? […]

  10. 10 DLounsbury

    January 3, 2008 @ 4:06 am CET

    Huckabee manipulated the media in the exact same way earlier.  This is a macrocosm of the earlier interview with the NY Times reporter when Huckabee asked him, "Don’t Mormons believe Jesus and Satan are brothers?"  Huckabee later explained, "I didn’t expect the reporter to write that–I thought we were off the record…" (yeah right….).  So Huckabee got to drop a bomb and look innocent at the same time.  The fact is Huckabee knew the answer to the question, having a theology degree, being Chairman of the Baptist Convention and having proselyted Mormons in Utah.   Talk about dishonest.

  11. 11 Mike Huckabee’s Passive-Aggressive Advertising Scam : The Sundries Shack

    January 3, 2008 @ 4:36 am CET

    […] it to reporters so they could see just how he had pulled himself back from the brink of perdition. And so he did. Of course, the reporters, seeing an ineptly crass political move, giggled and winked and played […]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Interested: With a major defeat there will be much greater acceptance of a need for change. They already had that in...
  • Interested: in addition, the guy’s a blow-dried phoney who ripped into McCain during the primaries.  Choosing him...
  • Interested: I try to admit it when I’m wrong.  And I was wrong about Hillary and Bill’s ability to step aside...
  • Michael Merritt: "If you like political humor, welcome but if you’re watching our show to catch up on...
  • Bob: When Hazleton Pennsylvania tried to crack down on immigration by holding companies and landlords responsible, a...

Partners