Bill Kristol: Times Columnist

Filed under: Feature, Media Criticism, Neoconservatives, New York Times, United States — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on December 29, 2007 @ 11:38 am CET

In what will probably cause quite a controversy, the New York Times is set to announce that neoconservative Bill Kristol will have a weekly Times column in 08.

The Anonymous Liberal explains why the NYT decided to ask Kristol to become a columnist for them: “The key to reaching the pinnacle of your profession is, apparently, to be 1) catastrophically wrong about everything, 2) utterly unwilling to acknowledge error, 3) willing to repeatedly lie and mislead your readers, and 4) completely batshit crazy,” he writes.

Although I’m not a big fan of Kristol - who’s less of an independent thinker and more of a propagandist - I’ve got to say that opposing him becoming a columnist for one newspaper or another is a bit silly (as some commenters at the HuffPo do). Let the man speak his mind. And: although he has been wrong about some things, he has also been right about other things, such as the surge.

Credit where credit is due.

More at Memeorandum.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

2 Comments »

  1. 1 sashal

    December 29, 2007 @ 2:20 pm CET

    If the Times wanted balance, they should have cut Bob Herbert and Gail Collins.
    Instead they hire Bill Kristol, who is to evil what Jonah Goldberg is to stupid.

  2. 2 Bill W

    December 29, 2007 @ 5:26 pm CET

    I guess the AL is describing Paul Krugman?  Those are exactly my thoughts on him.  I am not a big Kristol fan either - I could see how those on the left see him.  Maybe he is the balance to Krugman.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • v. gates: Homosexuality is choice; one can opt to believe one is a homosexual or one can opt otherwise. Lots of...
  • wilky: It is what it is Michael. Its been this way since I started reading the papers way back in 1967. The...
  • Michael Merritt: The best way to make families a non-issue is probably to ignore those who are making them an...
  • PhilosopherP: IF it is true, and that seems to be far from certain, they need to watch the old movie "But...
  • Michael Merritt: You know I’m a critic of the media, and have even defended Palin against some of the grossly...

Partners