National Poll: Hillary and Huckabee in the Lead

December 27th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The latest Rasmussen Reports poll shows that Governor Mike Huckabee is now the most popular Republican candidate (among likely Republican Primary voters) nationally, while Senator Hillary Clinton continues to lead among Democrats… by far.

20% of Republican primary voters say they support Huckabee, against 18% who say Rudy Giuliani and 14% who say John McCain. Mitt Romney is in fourth place nationally with 13%. Fred Thompson completes the top five with 11%. Ron Paul is the only other Republican candidate with a reasonably significant amount of support nationally with 5%.

The poll is, of course, good news for Huckabee, but it’s also good news for Romney and John McCain. He’s now only 4% behind Giuliani nationally: something no one would’ve expected only 2 months ago. It’s one of the many reasons why, according to Robert Novak, Republican insiders believe that McCain is in the best position to win the Republican nomination.

Also good news for Romney? Why yes, the gap with the most popular Republican - now Huckabee - is decreasing constantly. Not only that, the difference between himself and McCain can be ignored: they’re practically tied. And the gap with Giuliani has become so small, only 5% now, that he should be able to close it once he wins one or two states that hold their primaries early in the season.

He’s focusing on the early states, not on America as a whole. Once he starts winning, however, he’ll be catapulted into the lead nationally as well.

(Image to the right: Senator John McCain)

And yes, the same goes for McCain of course. If he finishes fourth or third in Iowa, and a close second in New Hampshire (or first), he’ll rise in the national polls immediately, probably overtaking Giuliani.

Not only that, if he does well in the Granite State, he could also do very well - perhaps even win - in both Michigan and South Carolina. What happens if McCain wins in at least one of those states? He’ll rise even more in the national polls.

And he’s got one great advantage over both Romney and Huckabee: people know him. In fact, they know everything they need to know about him. This is the man who almost beat George W. Bush in 2000.

As said, the poll is also great news for Huckabee, for two reasons:

1. He has left Giuliani behind and is now the national frontrunner

2. It shows that support for him has solidified. I read on some blogs that people believe that Huckabee will fall way back (to where he came from). I don’t believe that for one second. This poll confirms my hunch: Republican voters have had all the time they need to look at his record. A very big part of American conservatives have done so… and they like what they see. There’s no way that Huckabee will fall way back, especially not if he does well in Iowa. And don’t forget: if he wins in Iowa, he could also do well in South Carolina and some polls have him in the lead in Florida at this point in time as well.

The Democratic field is much less fluid, nationally at least. Clinton is the most popular Democrat with 39% of Likely Democratic Primary Voters saying they’ll vote for her, against 24% who say Barack Obama, and 16% who plan to vote for John Edwards.

What does this mean? The nomination is still Hillary Clinton’s to lose.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. JC
    December 27th, 2007 at 19:52
    Reply | Quote | #1

    edited by mvdg. no need for conspiracy theories.

  2. g8rvictor
    December 27th, 2007 at 19:54
    Reply | Quote | #2

    The most interesting thing about reading analysis from commentators in other countries is how they view our party nominating system.  The US  political parties use a decentralized, state-based nominating system that emphasizes performance in early states as well as fund-raising ability to finance the campaign into later contests.  So while some candidates are doing well nationally in polls, they do not have the finances to get beyond the early races unless they perform smashingly in those early races.

    Watch for those candidates who have had recent larges jumps in fundraising as the ones who have the most momentum and can really make an impact.

  3. Mehul
    December 27th, 2007 at 20:38
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Once the final votes are cast in Iowa and NH people will realize how unreliable these poll numbers are. For GOP nominees they only poll those who voted Republican during the last election and only those who have landlines. While this may not seem unusual, it is important to keep in mind the enormous support base that Ron Paul has garnered among disenfranchised Republicans who didn’t vote the last time. It also ignores the youngsters who never voted before this year (Ron Paul seems to have th lions share of young people). And there are many like myself who have changed their party affiliation to support Ron Paul. Please hear his speeched on youtube. Vote Ron Paul and save the country from this huge mess.

  4. kreiz
    December 27th, 2007 at 20:40
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I’m thinking game theory, and as such, the current GOP Pack represents a huge quandry.  If the Pack (not the Rat Pack) continues with major candidates garnering between 10-20% of the vote, there’s little incentive for any single Pack member to drop out.  Why would Thompson, for example, quit if he’s within reasonable striking distance of the leaders?  For that matter, why would/should anyone drop out?  But until someone drops out, it’s unlikely that there will be a breakaway candidate.  So the Pack will remain in place.

      

  5. Xel
    December 27th, 2007 at 20:54
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Huckabee or Giuliani. Precisely the two guys I don’t even want to be considered as candidates in the first place. In my eyes the GOP loses a lot of credibility and respect for not making this a battle between McCain and Romney, much like the DNC is playing a coward’s game by sticking to Clinton and the pragmatic, cut-corner and lazy past she represents.

  6. Oscar
    December 27th, 2007 at 21:31
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Edwards is poised to take the lead as the alternative to Hillary.

    Hillary and Obama are experiments who the democrtats need to give up.

    Edwards is The Man.

    Only white males have ever been nominees, or presidents.

  7. Interested
    December 27th, 2007 at 22:08
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Edwards is The Man. Only white males have ever been nominees, or presidents.

    First - who cares if they’re white or male?

    Second - Please do - let Edwards be the nominee - and watch a flood flow to the GOP nominee.

  8. Michael Litz
    December 28th, 2007 at 17:38
    Reply | Quote | #9

    There’s a long standing pattern that shows that the republican who wins two out of three of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina wins the nomination. Huckabee’s arrival on this years primary scene has been a "Godsend"  ( pardon the expression ) to republican values voters who have longed for a genuine, consistent and talented candidate that we could support. Huckabee is all that we could ask for and more and it is looking very much like he will win two of those three critical early states. It’s going to be a GREAT general election!

  9. Mike K
    December 29th, 2007 at 10:08

    Someone at Rasmussen needs to check their math:
    100 - 19 - 17 - 15 - 13 - 12 - 7 = 17% remaining

    That doesnt sound like 95% confidence to me, and yet another reason that a survey of 600-650 "likely" voters nationwide is completely unreliable.

  10. Michael van der Galien
    December 29th, 2007 at 12:55

    Huckabee is all that we could ask for and more and it is looking very much like he will win two of those three critical early states. It’s going to be a GREAT general election!

    I believe that he could indeed do well in the Republican nomination, but do you think he can win in the general election? I don’t.

  11. Mike
    December 30th, 2007 at 01:44

    Wow, this is really starting to get interesting.  I suspect that unless the "establishment" GOP coalesces around a frontrunner so that they have 40+ % on that one candidate, Ron Paul will come in and steal all the thunder and ultimately the nomination.  Those who have been paying even the slightest attention know the polls for Paul under-represent his support.  The question is by how much.  I don’t think there’s any doubt his support nationally is solidly into double digits, perhaps even 20% or higher.  If in Iowa and NH he places in the top 3 in each (which appears increasingly likely), and no candidate wins both, I say Ron Paul may well run away with this thing.

  12. Jack
    December 30th, 2007 at 07:30

    People, I’d like to inform everyone of something. Elections are still a year off. Trying to understand aspects of politics is like trying to understand electrical enginering while drunk. Republicans and Democrats alike will say that their opponents in the primary have different veiws than themselves. But yet they still share a politcal party. Let us not forget that George Washington himself disapproved of politcal parties. And Republicans used to be radicals as well. Bottom line: Politics are incredibly unpredictable. But I think McCain and Obama or Edwards will probably be the ones to make it through. Hillary is just too controversial, her own age group doesn’t identify with her.  Huckabee and Romney are left dirty from all the mudslinging and Giuliani? Since when does being a jump from mayor to president become normal. Plus, check the fianacial records from the time he was in office. they tell an interesting story. But bottom BOTTOM! Line is that politics are more complicated than the most intricate clock and what the average man thinks should happen is not always reality.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500