Will Smith on Hitler

December 26th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

It seems that Will Smith has caused quite a controversy: in an interview with the Scottish newspaper the Daily Record, Smith said (or was quoted as saying): “Even Hitler didn’t wake up going, ‘let me do the most evil thing I can do today.’ I think he woke up in the morning and using a twisted, backwards logic, he set out to do what he thought was ‘good’,” which sounds correct to me. However, the author of the article in the newspaper twisted what he said saying that “[r]emarkably, Will believes everyone is basically good.”

Which is, of course, not what he said at all.

Now, before the illiterates among us start accusing me of saying that Hitler was a “good” human being, let me repeat what Smith said about him after the controversy broke out: “Adolf Hitler was a vile, heinous vicious killer responsible for one of the greatest acts of evil committed on this planet.”

What Smith said - and what I am saying - then, isn’t that Hitler was good, it’s that Hitler thought he was good. That’s not a secret. Everyone who read his writings, listened to his speeches, etc. knows that. He believed that he had to remove evil from this planet. To us, Hitler was evil. To him, however, Jews, Gipsies, etc. were evil.

Trust me when I say that Hitler didn’t think “by God, am I evil! I enjoy being evil! Evil is me.” The only people who think like that are fictional characters. Not real people.

Am I, by pointing out the obvious, defending Hitler somehow?

Of course not.

Well, not if you’re actually capable of nuance and aren’t completely illiterate.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Tully
    December 26th, 2007 at 18:46
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Why anyone takes the political pronouncements of actors and musicians in the least seriously continues to puzzle me.

  2. Lynx
    December 26th, 2007 at 19:10
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Why you cannot say a good word anywhere in the vicinity of an evil person without being accused of supporting that person continues to puzzle me.

    Bill Maher got his show canceled for saying that the 9/11 hijackers weren’t cowards. He didn’t say they were good, just that they weren’t cowardly. He said it on a show called "Politically Incorrect". You can disagree with the statement, just like you can disagree with Will Smith on this, but the fact remains that some people can’t handle nuance, and will punish YOU for trying to give any.

  3. PJ
    December 26th, 2007 at 22:36
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Actually it was Dinesh D’Souza who said he thought that the 9/11 terrorists weren’t cowards. Maher agreed and also said that the Americans were cowards for lobbing cruise missiles from 2000 miles away.Also, good post.

  4. kritter
    December 27th, 2007 at 17:03
    Reply | Quote | #4

    In the first instance he was being analytical in a nuanced way about Hitler’s motivation; in the second he was responding to the controversy and trying to put it to rest. Just as s0meday history may judge current political figures as heinous villains, even though they believe in what they do. In the context of history, Hitler is a monster.

  5. Joshue
    December 29th, 2007 at 04:25
    Reply | Quote | #5

    <<Why anyone takes the political pronouncements of actors and musicians in the least seriously continues to puzzle me.>>Well I think they should probably be taken just as seriously as the pronouncements of anybody else in the world, at least just as seriously as random postings on the internet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500