Solar Array Feasible

Filed under: Energy, Science, Space — marc moore on December 19, 2007 @ 5:15 am CET

_44285045_suntower300nasa

The BBC has a cool article about the relative feasibility of using a low-orbit solar array as a source of renewable energy here

A recent study by the Pentagon concluded that a solar array in space was close to being technologically feasible, and robotics should soon make the building of large structures in space safer and quicker.

Leopold Summerer of the European Space Agency believes the generation of solar power from space may be only 20 years away.

But he adds that the cost of the undertaking will mean it will have to be another international effort along the lines of the Space Station.

 

That project is, as most readers know, not not scheduled to be completed for another 2+ years.  Do Europe and the U.S., which has provided more funding for the project than any other country, have the stomach for another large, high-risk project with uncertain returns?

Space stations and solar arrays are the stuff of scientists’ - and many libertarians’ - dreams.  Writing about this last, Kay Hymowitz had this to say in the WSJ

Libertarians come in many flavors, of course, but they share certain enthusiasms beyond free-market economics. They are often great consumers of science fiction, with an avid interest in space travel. And they have an almost unlimited enthusiasm for biotechnology, especially for advances that might allow us to manipulate our natures and extend our lives. Taken together, these elements constitute what might be called the libertarian dream–the dream of shaping your own meaning, liberated from family, from the past, from tradition, from biology, and perhaps even from the earth itself.

At the risk of being branded with the “l” word, I have to say that I’m all for the project. 

The U.S.’s contribution to the ISS will be about $35B by the time it is finished (not counting the maintenance costs over its estimated 8 year life-span).  That’s a mere drop in the bucket for a House that just passed a $516B budget bill that includes over $7B in pork/earmarks.

According to scientists, the solar array is doable.  Robert Laine from EADS Astrium, the Anglo-French space company says:

“It’s a matter of developing the technology to make the solar panels cheaper, to send them into the sky and have the energy conversion to microwaves or optical lasers which then beam the energy down to Earth.

“All of that is demonstrated to be technically feasible. Again it’s a matter of economics”.

It’s unclear whether a solar array project would play a meaningful role in the effort to make western nations more energy independent or not.  Yet what is obvious is that we need to seed a hundred or a thousand or ten thousand different ideas in order to ensure that we make the advances that we must make.

One thing is certain:  There’s no mystery as to where continuing to depend on Saudi Arabia, et al, will lead us.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

2 Comments »

  1. 1 Interested

    December 19, 2007 @ 6:28 am CET

    Do Europe and the U.S., which has provided more funding for the project than any other country, have the stomach for another large, high-risk project with uncertain returns?

    We certainly should IMO.  But not just for what is the returns.  We engage in science for discovery - be it if it has a practical purpose or no purpose at all.   We engage in projects like these for the hope that it will - but reap the rewards of spin off technologies that themselves may just create something spectacular.

    And we do it because no other nation will.

  2. 2 Dustin Metzger

    December 19, 2007 @ 8:29 am CET

    Honestly I’ve been a proponent of solar-array microwave power since I first read about it years ago. While high mindedness is all well and good I honestly think of this in terms of national security. Combined with ground-based renewable sources (nuclear, solar - if they use it, hydro, etc) this right here could if deployed on a large enough scale meet all of America’s energy needs.

    Can you say no more Middle East dependency? Given what we’re willing to spend in blood and capital to ensure a flow of oil this one should be a no-brainer.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • wilky: It is what it is Michael. Its been this way since I started reading the papers way back in 1967. The...
  • Michael Merritt: The best way to make families a non-issue is probably to ignore those who are making them an...
  • PhilosopherP: IF it is true, and that seems to be far from certain, they need to watch the old movie "But...
  • Michael Merritt: You know I’m a critic of the media, and have even defended Palin against some of the grossly...
  • moorpipe: 11th August 2008 - Luggage Handlers Strike at Brussels Airport Baggage handlers employed by Aviapartner and...

Partners